Comparative study of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in the treatment of patients with COPD and community-acquired pneumonia

This study aims to provide a reference for clinical treatment selection by comparing noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) complicated by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). From January 2022 to December 2023, 63 patients with COPD and CAP treated at our hospital were enrolled. Patients were allocated to either the NIV group (33 patients) or the HFNC group (30 patients), in addition to receiving conventional treatments. The groups were compared across various parameters including respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), oxygenation index (PaO2/fraction of inspiration O2 [FiO2]), rates of complications, tracheal intubation, mortality, total hospital stay, and hospital costs at 1, 3, and 7 days post-treatment. After 1, 3, and 7 days of treatment, both groups exhibited significant improvements in RR, SpO2, PaO2, and PaO2/FiO2 from baseline (P < .05). The improvements increased over time. However, no significant differences were observed between the NIV and HFNC groups in RR, SpO2, PaO2, and PaO2/FiO2 at the measured time points (P > .05); the HFNC group experienced lower rates of complications such as facial injuries, dry nose and mouth, and bloating (P < .05). No significant differences were found in tracheal intubation rates, mortality rates, total hospital stay, and total hospital costs between the groups (P > .05). Both NIV and HFNC effectively improve respiratory and circulatory parameters in patients with COPD and CAP, with similar efficacy rates. While there were no significant differences in tracheal intubation rates, mortality rates, total hospital duration, and costs, HFNC was associated with fewer complications and greater patient comfort, rendering it a more favorable clinical option.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000041829
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in the treatment of patients with COPD and community-acquired pneumonia

Xiaobai Zhang, Chenhui Wang, Lina Xu, Wei Ji et al.
Medicine
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Comparative study of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in the treatment of patients with COPD and community-acquired pneumonia

Xiaobai Zhang, Chenhui Wang, Lina Xu, Wei Ji, H. Ji
article en

Abstract

This study aims to provide a reference for clinical treatment selection by comparing noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) complicated by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). From January 2022 to December 2023, 63 patients with COPD and CAP treated at our hospital were enrolled. Patients were allocated to either the NIV group (33 patients) or the HFNC group (30 patients), in addition to receiving conventional treatments. The groups were compared across various parameters including respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), oxygenation index (PaO2/fraction of inspiration O2 [FiO2]), rates of complications, tracheal intubation, mortality, total hospital stay, and hospital costs at 1, 3, and 7 days post-treatment. After 1, 3, and 7 days of treatment, both groups exhibited significant improvements in RR, SpO2, PaO2, and PaO2/FiO2 from baseline (P < .05). The improvements increased over time. However, no significant differences were observed between the NIV and HFNC groups in RR, SpO2, PaO2, and PaO2/FiO2 at the measured time points (P > .05); the HFNC group experienced lower rates of complications such as facial injuries, dry nose and mouth, and bloating (P < .05). No significant differences were found in tracheal intubation rates, mortality rates, total hospital stay, and total hospital costs between the groups (P > .05). Both NIV and HFNC effectively improve respiratory and circulatory parameters in patients with COPD and CAP, with similar efficacy rates. While there were no significant differences in tracheal intubation rates, mortality rates, total hospital duration, and costs, HFNC was associated with fewer complications and greater patient comfort, rendering it a more favorable clinical option.

MedicineVol. 104(11)
Nantong University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.