Exploring Agency | Passivity and Emotional Energy in an Elementary STEM Classroom

Abstract Learner agency is often attributed with taking-action, as the antithesis of passivity and perceived in-action. Our study challenges common perceptions and explores connectivity between agency, passivity, and emotionality in learning, which are not fully understood in science education research. The interplay between agency, passivity, and emotionality are explored through learner experiences in an elementary school STEM classroom. We view agency as a relational phenomenon involving sensitivity between learners as agents and their environment. Sensitivity involves passivity towards the environment as an essential part of agentic learning. Emotionality is related as it drives sensitivity and attentiveness toward objects of learning, contributing to evidence of agentic intentionality. This study is informed by an event-orientated methodology with an ethnomethodological orientation using visual data to investigate episodes of small group social interactions in the classroom. Interpretative dimensions of this study, around emotionality, draw from a conceptual framework involving emotional energy as an experience of collective focus, and an understanding of agency | passivity as co-existing in a dialectical relationship. Findings of this study illustrate the interplay between agency | passivity and emotional energy as a way of understanding the nature of learning experiences through micro-social practices. This paper contributes to the emotions in science education literature and the knowledge generated will contribute to teaching practices aimed at shaping productive science learning experiences. As an exploratory study this paper suggests possibilities for further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Science Education
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10241-5
Primary Topic
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Agency | Passivity and Emotional Energy in an Elementary STEM Classroom

James Davis, Xianqing Bao, Juan Du, Feng‐Kuang Chiang
Research in Science Education
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
article

Exploring Agency | Passivity and Emotional Energy in an Elementary STEM Classroom

James Davis, Xianqing Bao, Juan Du, Feng‐Kuang Chiang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Learner agency is often attributed with taking-action, as the antithesis of passivity and perceived in-action. Our study challenges common perceptions and explores connectivity between agency, passivity, and emotionality in learning, which are not fully understood in science education research. The interplay between agency, passivity, and emotionality are explored through learner experiences in an elementary school STEM classroom. We view agency as a relational phenomenon involving sensitivity between learners as agents and their environment. Sensitivity involves passivity towards the environment as an essential part of agentic learning. Emotionality is related as it drives sensitivity and attentiveness toward objects of learning, contributing to evidence of agentic intentionality. This study is informed by an event-orientated methodology with an ethnomethodological orientation using visual data to investigate episodes of small group social interactions in the classroom. Interpretative dimensions of this study, around emotionality, draw from a conceptual framework involving emotional energy as an experience of collective focus, and an understanding of agency | passivity as co-existing in a dialectical relationship. Findings of this study illustrate the interplay between agency | passivity and emotional energy as a way of understanding the nature of learning experiences through micro-social practices. This paper contributes to the emotions in science education literature and the knowledge generated will contribute to teaching practices aimed at shaping productive science learning experiences. As an exploratory study this paper suggests possibilities for further research.

Research in Science EducationVol. 55(6)
University of Liverpool (GB), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Shanghai Normal University (CN)
Queensland University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.