Ready to ROC? A tutorial on simulation-based power analyses for null hypothesis significance, minimum-effect, and equivalence testing for ROC curve analyses

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and its corresponding (partial) area under the curve (AUC) are frequently used statistical tools in psychological research to assess the discriminability of a test, method, intervention, or procedure. In this paper, we provide a tutorial on conducting simulation-based power analyses for ROC curve and (p)AUC analyses in R. We also created a Shiny app and the R package "ROCpower" to perform such power analyses. In our tutorial, we highlight the importance of setting the smallest effect size of interest (SESOI) for which researchers want to conduct their power analysis. The SESOI is the smallest effect that is practically or theoretically relevant for a specific field of research or study. We provide how such a SESOI can be established and how it changes hypotheses from simply establishing whether there is a statistically significant effect (i.e., null-hypothesis significance testing) to whether the effects are practically or theoretically important (i.e., minimum-effect testing) or whether the effect is too small to care about (i.e., equivalence testing). We show how power analyses for these different hypothesis tests can be conducted via a confidence interval-focused approach. This confidence interval-focused, simulation-based power analysis can be adapted to different research designs and questions and improves the reproducibility of power analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02646-x
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ready to ROC? A tutorial on simulation-based power analyses for null hypothesis significance, minimum-effect, and equivalence testing for ROC curve analyses

Henry Otgaar, Charlotte A. Bücken, Paul Riesthuis
5 citations
Behavior Research Methods
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
6.99
article

Ready to ROC? A tutorial on simulation-based power analyses for null hypothesis significance, minimum-effect, and equivalence testing for ROC curve analyses

Henry Otgaar, Charlotte A. Bücken, Paul Riesthuis
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and its corresponding (partial) area under the curve (AUC) are frequently used statistical tools in psychological research to assess the discriminability of a test, method, intervention, or procedure. In this paper, we provide a tutorial on conducting simulation-based power analyses for ROC curve and (p)AUC analyses in R. We also created a Shiny app and the R package "ROCpower" to perform such power analyses. In our tutorial, we highlight the importance of setting the smallest effect size of interest (SESOI) for which researchers want to conduct their power analysis. The SESOI is the smallest effect that is practically or theoretically relevant for a specific field of research or study. We provide how such a SESOI can be established and how it changes hypotheses from simply establishing whether there is a statistically significant effect (i.e., null-hypothesis significance testing) to whether the effects are practically or theoretically important (i.e., minimum-effect testing) or whether the effect is too small to care about (i.e., equivalence testing). We show how power analyses for these different hypothesis tests can be conducted via a confidence interval-focused approach. This confidence interval-focused, simulation-based power analysis can be adapted to different research designs and questions and improves the reproducibility of power analyses.

Behavior Research MethodsVol. 57(4)
Maastricht University (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
6.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.