Parametric Predictive Bootstrap Method for the Reproducibility of Hypothesis Tests

Abstract Hypothesis tests are essential tools in applied statistics, but their results can vary when repeated. The reproducibility probability (RP) quantifies the probability of obtaining the same test outcome—either rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis—if a hypothesis test is repeated under identical conditions. In this paper, we apply the parametric predictive bootstrap (PP-B) method to evaluate the reproducibility of parametric tests and compare it with the nonparametric predictive bootstrap (NPI-B) method. The explicitly predictive nature of both methods aligns well with the concept of RP. Simulation studies demonstrate that PP-B provides RP values with less variability than NPI-B, benefiting from the assumed parametric model. The bootstrap approach offers a flexible framework for assessing test reproducibility and can be extended to a wide range of parametric tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-025-00438-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parametric Predictive Bootstrap Method for the Reproducibility of Hypothesis Tests

Abdulrahman M. A. Aldawsari, Tahani Coolen‐Maturi, Frank P. A. Coolen
2 citations
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
1.61
article

Parametric Predictive Bootstrap Method for the Reproducibility of Hypothesis Tests

Abdulrahman M. A. Aldawsari, Tahani Coolen‐Maturi, Frank P. A. Coolen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Hypothesis tests are essential tools in applied statistics, but their results can vary when repeated. The reproducibility probability (RP) quantifies the probability of obtaining the same test outcome—either rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis—if a hypothesis test is repeated under identical conditions. In this paper, we apply the parametric predictive bootstrap (PP-B) method to evaluate the reproducibility of parametric tests and compare it with the nonparametric predictive bootstrap (NPI-B) method. The explicitly predictive nature of both methods aligns well with the concept of RP. Simulation studies demonstrate that PP-B provides RP values with less variability than NPI-B, benefiting from the assumed parametric model. The bootstrap approach offers a flexible framework for assessing test reproducibility and can be extended to a wide range of parametric tests.

Journal of Statistical Theory and PracticeVol. 19(2)
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), Durham University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Parametric Predictive Bootstrap Method for the Reproducibility of Hypothesis Tests — Abdulrahman M. A. Aldawsari, Tahani Coolen‐Maturi, et al. · Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS