Supporting a bidirectional feedback process for self-assessment tasks in a digital learning environment

Abstract Bidirectional Feedback may benefit students by facilitating learning success and goal achievement and can help teachers address students’ needs and/or assess and improve learning material. Current feedback practices have limitations, such as the difficulty for students to formulate understandable feedback for teachers, the effort required for students and teachers to engage in feedback dialogue, and the challenge for teachers to manage multiple feedback responses across a wide range of learning material. Thus, there is a need for computational support in a digital learning environment that facilitates bidirectional feedback creation, processing, and dialogue. To this end, we present a process model of bidirectional feedback, a conceptual design of a computational support to assist this process, and its implementation for the self-assessment task type in Moodle. It was implemented and evaluated in a distance learning course in a B.Sc. Computer Science program. With the use of computer-assisted support for the bidirectional feedback process, an increase in feedback from more students was observed and was related to more self-assessment tasks. Feedback included not only negative but also positive feedback. Teachers confirmed the usefulness of computational support as well as the usefulness and understandability of student-generated feedback messages, both for helping students and for assessing and improving the quality of assignments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00512-6
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting a bidirectional feedback process for self-assessment tasks in a digital learning environment

Regina Kasakowskij, Jörg M. Haake
4 citations
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Student Assessment and Feedback
35.70
article

Supporting a bidirectional feedback process for self-assessment tasks in a digital learning environment

Regina Kasakowskij, Jörg M. Haake
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Bidirectional Feedback may benefit students by facilitating learning success and goal achievement and can help teachers address students’ needs and/or assess and improve learning material. Current feedback practices have limitations, such as the difficulty for students to formulate understandable feedback for teachers, the effort required for students and teachers to engage in feedback dialogue, and the challenge for teachers to manage multiple feedback responses across a wide range of learning material. Thus, there is a need for computational support in a digital learning environment that facilitates bidirectional feedback creation, processing, and dialogue. To this end, we present a process model of bidirectional feedback, a conceptual design of a computational support to assist this process, and its implementation for the self-assessment task type in Moodle. It was implemented and evaluated in a distance learning course in a B.Sc. Computer Science program. With the use of computer-assisted support for the bidirectional feedback process, an increase in feedback from more students was observed and was related to more self-assessment tasks. Feedback included not only negative but also positive feedback. Teachers confirmed the usefulness of computational support as well as the usefulness and understandability of student-generated feedback messages, both for helping students and for assessing and improving the quality of assignments.

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher EducationVol. 22(1)
FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Student Assessment and Feedback
35.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.