Complex wound analysis using AI

Impaired wound healing is a significant clinical challenge. Standard wound analysis approaches are macroscopic, with limited histological assessments that rely on visual inspection of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections of biopsies. The analysis is time-consuming, requires a specialist trained to recognise various wound features, and therefore is often omitted in practice. We present an automated deep-learning (DL) approach capable of objectively and comprehensively analysing images of H&E-stained wound sections. Our model has a deep neural network (DNN) architecture, optimised for segmentation of characteristic wound features. We employed our model for the first-time analysis of human complex wounds. Histologically, human wounds are extremely variable, which presented a challenge when segmenting the different tissue classes. To validate our approach, we used mouse wound biopsy images across four timepoints of healing and employed the same DNN architecture for training and analysis in this context (89 % mean test set accuracy). We revised our approach for human complex wounds, analysing the biopsies at a cellular level, where our model performance improved (97 % mean test set accuracy). Together, our approach allows: (i) comprehensive analysis of human wound biopsy images; (ii) in-depth analysis of key features of mouse wound healing with accurate morphometric analysis and; (iii) analysis and quantification of immune cell infiltration, to aid clinical diagnosis of human complex wounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109945
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complex wound analysis using AI

Paul Hiebert, Claudia Lindner, Svitlana Kurinna, T.F. Cootes et al.
1 citations
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
1.29
article

Complex wound analysis using AI

Paul Hiebert, Claudia Lindner, Svitlana Kurinna, T.F. Cootes, Adam J. Reid, Jason Wong, Lewis Dingle, Jeremy Herrera, C. J. Robinson, Bruce Dickie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Impaired wound healing is a significant clinical challenge. Standard wound analysis approaches are macroscopic, with limited histological assessments that rely on visual inspection of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections of biopsies. The analysis is time-consuming, requires a specialist trained to recognise various wound features, and therefore is often omitted in practice. We present an automated deep-learning (DL) approach capable of objectively and comprehensively analysing images of H&E-stained wound sections. Our model has a deep neural network (DNN) architecture, optimised for segmentation of characteristic wound features. We employed our model for the first-time analysis of human complex wounds. Histologically, human wounds are extremely variable, which presented a challenge when segmenting the different tissue classes. To validate our approach, we used mouse wound biopsy images across four timepoints of healing and employed the same DNN architecture for training and analysis in this context (89 % mean test set accuracy). We revised our approach for human complex wounds, analysing the biopsies at a cellular level, where our model performance improved (97 % mean test set accuracy). Together, our approach allows: (i) comprehensive analysis of human wound biopsy images; (ii) in-depth analysis of key features of mouse wound healing with accurate morphometric analysis and; (iii) analysis and quantification of immune cell infiltration, to aid clinical diagnosis of human complex wounds.

Computers in Biology and MedicineVol. 190
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Wellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research (GB), Health Data Research UK (GB), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Hull York Medical School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.