H-Mode density limit disruption avoidance in ASDEX Upgrade, TCV and JET

In recent years a strong effort has been made to investigate disruption avoidance schemes in order to aid the development of integrated operational scenarios for ITER. Within the EUROfusion programme the disruptive H-Mode density limit (HDL) has been studied on ASDEX Upgrade, TCV and JET. This paper presents the results from these studies in the view of the plasma control system (PCS). The successful migration of disruption avoidance schemes based on direct measurements as well as state space based HDL observers across the devices has been demonstrated. HDL disruption avoidance using continuous control is now routinely available at TCV and ASDEX Upgrade, using both observer types. Exception handling based disruption avoidance has been utilized on all three devices. All three control systems allowed the implementation of the desired schemes with minimal adaptions, implementing the equivalent detection algorithms. Using the same experimental methodology it is confirmed that the XPR/MARFE movement, which is preceding the disruptive HDL, is similar on all three devices. The main difference lies in the associated times scales which increase with machine size. This would be beneficial for large devices, such as ITER and DEMO, since it would give the control system more time to apply the appropriate disruption avoidance action. As actuator auxiliary heating, gas flow and plasma shaping have been successfully demonstrated. This work gives input for the requirements of future tokamak control systems which should enable the necessary disruption avoidance schemes. All disruption avoidance schemes developed during the studies can be implemented in the ITER PCS with its currently foreseen capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fusion Engineering and Design
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114961
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

H-Mode density limit disruption avoidance in ASDEX Upgrade, TCV and JET

B. Sieglin, A. Pau, O. Kudláček, Peter Fox et al.
1 citations
Fusion Engineering and Design
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.87
article

H-Mode density limit disruption avoidance in ASDEX Upgrade, TCV and JET

B. Sieglin, A. Pau, O. Kudláček, Peter Fox, A. Gude, M. Bernert, W. Treutterer, A. Huber, C. Stuart, M. Lennholm, K. Kirov, F. Klossek, F. Felici, L. Piron, O. Sauter, A. Parrott, Hongjuan Sun, M. Maraschek, C. Ashe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years a strong effort has been made to investigate disruption avoidance schemes in order to aid the development of integrated operational scenarios for ITER. Within the EUROfusion programme the disruptive H-Mode density limit (HDL) has been studied on ASDEX Upgrade, TCV and JET. This paper presents the results from these studies in the view of the plasma control system (PCS). The successful migration of disruption avoidance schemes based on direct measurements as well as state space based HDL observers across the devices has been demonstrated. HDL disruption avoidance using continuous control is now routinely available at TCV and ASDEX Upgrade, using both observer types. Exception handling based disruption avoidance has been utilized on all three devices. All three control systems allowed the implementation of the desired schemes with minimal adaptions, implementing the equivalent detection algorithms. Using the same experimental methodology it is confirmed that the XPR/MARFE movement, which is preceding the disruptive HDL, is similar on all three devices. The main difference lies in the associated times scales which increase with machine size. This would be beneficial for large devices, such as ITER and DEMO, since it would give the control system more time to apply the appropriate disruption avoidance action. As actuator auxiliary heating, gas flow and plasma shaping have been successfully demonstrated. This work gives input for the requirements of future tokamak control systems which should enable the necessary disruption avoidance schemes. All disruption avoidance schemes developed during the studies can be implemented in the ITER PCS with its currently foreseen capabilities.

Fusion Engineering and DesignVol. 215
University of Padua (IT), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Culham Science Centre (GB), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (DE), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.