Simulation toolchain for the development of metal hydride storage systems
To facilitate the role of hydrogen in the energy transition, efficient hydrogen storage is required. By offering high volumetric storage densities and operation near ambient conditions, hydrogen storage in metal hydrides (MH) is a promising alternative to currently more widely used compressed gaseous and liquid storage. However, to achieve fast filling and extraction times, efficient thermal management is required. This can lead to high design complexity and costs. In this work, zero- (0D) and three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tank models for hydrogen filling simulations are developed and experimentally validated in order to evaluate and compare different thermal management designs. By utilizing the synergies between the 0D and 3D models, a novel simulation toolchain for designing metal hydride tanks is proposed. The presented methodology is advantageous for rapid early design studies leveraging the 0D model to pre-select tank designs prior to detailed 3D investigations. This aids tank developers to select the most cost-effective design for given application requirements. •Development and validation of a 0D and 3D CFD metal hydride storage tank model. •Experimental validation of the 0D tank model. •Development of heat transfer correlations between the 0D and 3D CFD tank model. •Investigation of various tank designs to optimize thermal management. •Development of a simulation-aided tank design toolchain.
Authors
- Alexander Trattner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1297-4983)
- Franz Winkler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-7511)
- Nejc Klopčič (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2038-3945)
- Karin Rainwald
- Valentin Gruber
Institutions
- Graz University of Technology (AT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
- Published
- 2025-03-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.186
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Hydrogen Storage and Materials
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.52