Prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of perfluoropropane for ophthalmic surgery
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a common sight-threatening ophthalmic emergency requiring surgical intervention. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of experimental perfluoropropane (C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>) for intraocular tamponade during vitreoretinal surgery. A prospective randomized controlled trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the experimental C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>. A total of 136 patients with RRD requiring C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>-assisted treatment from six centers in China were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the control group or the experimental group. The control group used C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> from AL.CHI.MI.A.Srl (Italy), whereas the experimental group utilized C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> from Shanghai Jessi Medical Technology Co., Ltd (China). Follow-up assessments were conducted at 1, 7, 14, 28, and 60 d postoperatively. The primary outcome was retinal reattachment rate at 7 d post-surgery. The secondary outcomes included retinal reattachment rates at 1, 14, 28, and 60 d post-surgery, changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and gas retention. Safety assessments included systemic and ocular adverse events. Differential analysis of these indicators between the two groups were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the experimental C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>. At 7 d post-surgery, the complete retinal reattachment rate was 100% in the control group and 98.41% in the experimental group (P > 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups across all follow-up time points in secondary outcomes and safety indicators. In patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for retinal detachment, experimental C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> demonstrates non-inferior to control C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> as an intraocular tamponade. Both variants are safe and well-tolerated.
Authors
- Bojie Hu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7840-8290)
- Yan Jiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4434-3462)
- Ruiping Gu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3742-4512)
- Chunhui Jiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7857-9292)
- Fang Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7713-561X)
- Ying Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9924-3026)
- Kun Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3274-9989)
- Xiaorong Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0641-2797)
- Quanhong Han
- Xun William Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6294-8153)
- Chunli Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-6775)
- Xin Shi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0054-7458)
- Gongqiang Yuan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0809-5502)
- Rui Jiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8797-0066)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Visual Neuroscience
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.48130/vns-0025-0002
- Primary Topic
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- National Science and Technology Major Project