Civilian Mindsets and Attitudes toward Peace in Wartime: Evidence from Ukraine

Abstract Under what conditions do civilians in countries at war support peace settlements? This study develops a theory of civilian attitudes that integrates two major forces shaping wartime thinking to illuminate when people support peaceful compromise. We argue that survival and injustice are two crucial and often competing mindsets that shape how individuals understand and navigate violent conflicts. Civilians exhibiting an injustice-oriented mindset focus more on the objectives of their collective identity group, developing wartime attitudes out of concern for in-group grievances and goals. In contrast, civilians with a survival-based mindset concentrate on the concrete dangers war poses to themselves and their loved ones. To explore these ideas, we fielded two waves of a pre-registered survey in wartime Ukraine in the summer of 2022 and spring of 2023. We find that there is considerable variation across individuals in the extent to which they hold a survival or injustice mindset about the war. Moreover, this variation is strongly linked to their attitudes toward peace across both waves. At the same time, individual mindsets are insensitive to experimental primes, suggesting that they may not be easily manipulated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Studies Quarterly
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaf019
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Civilian Mindsets and Attitudes toward Peace in Wartime: Evidence from Ukraine

Daniel Silverman, Anna Pechenkina, Austin Knuppe
1 citations
International Studies Quarterly
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
article

Civilian Mindsets and Attitudes toward Peace in Wartime: Evidence from Ukraine

Daniel Silverman, Anna Pechenkina, Austin Knuppe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Under what conditions do civilians in countries at war support peace settlements? This study develops a theory of civilian attitudes that integrates two major forces shaping wartime thinking to illuminate when people support peaceful compromise. We argue that survival and injustice are two crucial and often competing mindsets that shape how individuals understand and navigate violent conflicts. Civilians exhibiting an injustice-oriented mindset focus more on the objectives of their collective identity group, developing wartime attitudes out of concern for in-group grievances and goals. In contrast, civilians with a survival-based mindset concentrate on the concrete dangers war poses to themselves and their loved ones. To explore these ideas, we fielded two waves of a pre-registered survey in wartime Ukraine in the summer of 2022 and spring of 2023. We find that there is considerable variation across individuals in the extent to which they hold a survival or injustice mindset about the war. Moreover, this variation is strongly linked to their attitudes toward peace across both waves. At the same time, individual mindsets are insensitive to experimental primes, suggesting that they may not be easily manipulated.

International Studies QuarterlyVol. 69(2)
Utah State University (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.