Rivers as Natural Capital Assets: A Quick Scoping Review to Assess the Evidence Linking River Asset Condition to Changes in the Flow of Ecosystem Services

ABSTRACT River managers are beginning to adopt natural capital approaches in practice. However, while it is crucial for river management, the link between river asset condition and the flow of ecosystem services is poorly understood. In this study, we conducted a Quick Scoping Review (QSR) of the research into river asset condition and ecosystem service delivery to explore the current state of knowledge. The review team developed a PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome) model to transpose the concepts of the research enquiry into a search strategy for the evidence base and used a Delphi screening exercise to prioritise a subset of literature for the narrative findings. VOSviewer was used to analyse the high‐level linguistic themes from the full list of references. This co‐designed, collaborative and objective QSR approach allowed us to examine a large body of literature in a reproducible manner while minimising bias, demonstrating best practice for evidence review that should be continuously updated, generating a ‘living evidence’ knowledge asset. The results of the review demonstrate there is some knowledge of the mechanisms linking the condition of river assets to the delivery of ecosystem services for the majority of the broad range of ecosystem services analysed, with the exception of some of the cultural services, where comparatively fewer studies explore this link. However, a clear understanding of the quantitative evidence of the relationships between condition and ecosystem service delivery is missing for all of the ecosystem services. This gap stems from a lack of standardised methodologies used across the studies and a focus on a narrow range of definitions of condition. The gap needs to be addressed in future research on the topic, and a first step is to adopt more standardised indicators of river asset condition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
River Research and Applications
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4439
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rivers as Natural Capital Assets: A Quick Scoping Review to Assess the Evidence Linking River Asset Condition to Changes in the Flow of Ecosystem Services

Marc Naura, Chris Cooper, Valentina Zini, Natalie Johnson et al.
2 citations
River Research and Applications
Economic and Environmental Valuation
6.26
article

Rivers as Natural Capital Assets: A Quick Scoping Review to Assess the Evidence Linking River Asset Condition to Changes in the Flow of Ecosystem Services

Marc Naura, Chris Cooper, Valentina Zini, Natalie Johnson, James R. Rouquette, A E Crouch, Gerard Lenagan, Imogen Speck
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT River managers are beginning to adopt natural capital approaches in practice. However, while it is crucial for river management, the link between river asset condition and the flow of ecosystem services is poorly understood. In this study, we conducted a Quick Scoping Review (QSR) of the research into river asset condition and ecosystem service delivery to explore the current state of knowledge. The review team developed a PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome) model to transpose the concepts of the research enquiry into a search strategy for the evidence base and used a Delphi screening exercise to prioritise a subset of literature for the narrative findings. VOSviewer was used to analyse the high‐level linguistic themes from the full list of references. This co‐designed, collaborative and objective QSR approach allowed us to examine a large body of literature in a reproducible manner while minimising bias, demonstrating best practice for evidence review that should be continuously updated, generating a ‘living evidence’ knowledge asset. The results of the review demonstrate there is some knowledge of the mechanisms linking the condition of river assets to the delivery of ecosystem services for the majority of the broad range of ecosystem services analysed, with the exception of some of the cultural services, where comparatively fewer studies explore this link. However, a clear understanding of the quantitative evidence of the relationships between condition and ecosystem service delivery is missing for all of the ecosystem services. This gap stems from a lack of standardised methodologies used across the studies and a focus on a narrow range of definitions of condition. The gap needs to be addressed in future research on the topic, and a first step is to adopt more standardised indicators of river asset condition.

River Research and ApplicationsVol. 41(6)
Environment Agency (GB), University of Southampton (GB), Cranfield University (GB)
Government of the United Kingdom, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.