Defining the Contours of Religion, State, and Modernity

Who commits religious discrimination, and why? Recent findings at the country level show an inverse relationship between societal religiosity and social religious discrimination, but findings at the individual level show an increase in conservatism among religious practitioners. In this study, I seek to bridge the gap these levels with a novel framework of religious identity. I argue that the threat of secularism can cause religious communities to reinforce boundaries between themselves and other groups. This should manifest itself in hostile attitudes toward members of other religions. I test this theory using multilevel data. I find that as aggregate religiosity declines, individual religiosity increasingly predicts inter-religious hostility. At the same time, this effect is only the case concerning community- and practice-based aspects of religiosity, and not among beliefs in-and-of-themselves. This study bridges a gap between macro-level findings regarding religion and state and micro-level findings regarding the modernization hypothesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251323404
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining the Contours of Religion, State, and Modernity

Brendan Szendrő
Political Studies
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Defining the Contours of Religion, State, and Modernity

Brendan Szendrő
article en

Abstract

Who commits religious discrimination, and why? Recent findings at the country level show an inverse relationship between societal religiosity and social religious discrimination, but findings at the individual level show an increase in conservatism among religious practitioners. In this study, I seek to bridge the gap these levels with a novel framework of religious identity. I argue that the threat of secularism can cause religious communities to reinforce boundaries between themselves and other groups. This should manifest itself in hostile attitudes toward members of other religions. I test this theory using multilevel data. I find that as aggregate religiosity declines, individual religiosity increasingly predicts inter-religious hostility. At the same time, this effect is only the case concerning community- and practice-based aspects of religiosity, and not among beliefs in-and-of-themselves. This study bridges a gap between macro-level findings regarding religion and state and micro-level findings regarding the modernization hypothesis.

Political StudiesVol. 74(1)
McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defining the Contours of Religion, State, and Modernity — Brendan Szendrő · Political Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS