Comparing classroom and digital settings: the role of basic psychological needs on EFL students’ IDLE engagement

Abstract English as a foreign language (EFL) students are increasingly learning English in extramural digital settings (informal digital learning of English; IDLE). Previous research has investigated the antecedents of IDLE engagement, focusing on basic psychological needs (BPNs) in classroom settings. However, little attention has been given to the role of BPNs in digital settings, where digital-native EFL students often fulfil their psychological needs. This study explores the relationship between two core BPNs – competence and relatedness – in both classroom and digital settings and IDLE engagement among 226 Kazakhstani university EFL students. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicate that, in the classroom , students who perceive themselves as more competent are more likely to engage in receptive and productive IDLE. Also, a higher sense of in-class relatedness strengthens the positive relationship between in-class competence and productive IDLE. In the digital settings , students who perceive themselves as more competent are more likely to engage in receptive IDLE, while competence alone does not directly lead to productive IDLE. A higher sense of relatedness positively moderates the links, amplifying the connection between competence and engagement in both receptive and productive IDLE. These findings suggest that educators can enhance EFL students’ IDLE engagement by designing and recommending activities that foster competence and a sense of community in both classroom and digital settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ReCALL
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344025000059
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
27.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing classroom and digital settings: the role of basic psychological needs on EFL students’ IDLE engagement

Artem Zadorozhnyy, Ju Seong Lee
8 citations
ReCALL
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
27.56
article

Comparing classroom and digital settings: the role of basic psychological needs on EFL students’ IDLE engagement

Artem Zadorozhnyy, Ju Seong Lee
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract English as a foreign language (EFL) students are increasingly learning English in extramural digital settings (informal digital learning of English; IDLE). Previous research has investigated the antecedents of IDLE engagement, focusing on basic psychological needs (BPNs) in classroom settings. However, little attention has been given to the role of BPNs in digital settings, where digital-native EFL students often fulfil their psychological needs. This study explores the relationship between two core BPNs – competence and relatedness – in both classroom and digital settings and IDLE engagement among 226 Kazakhstani university EFL students. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicate that, in the classroom , students who perceive themselves as more competent are more likely to engage in receptive and productive IDLE. Also, a higher sense of in-class relatedness strengthens the positive relationship between in-class competence and productive IDLE. In the digital settings , students who perceive themselves as more competent are more likely to engage in receptive IDLE, while competence alone does not directly lead to productive IDLE. A higher sense of relatedness positively moderates the links, amplifying the connection between competence and engagement in both receptive and productive IDLE. These findings suggest that educators can enhance EFL students’ IDLE engagement by designing and recommending activities that foster competence and a sense of community in both classroom and digital settings.

ReCALLVol. 37(3)
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
27.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.