Who Do People Prefer to Be in Charge? An In-Depth Analysis of UK Citizens’ Preferences for Politicians, Citizens, Experts, and/or Artificial Intelligence in Policymaking

For a long time, research on democratic governance has primarily focused on preferences for singular decision-makers: elected politicians, citizens, or experts. Recently, however, there has been a shift toward considering preferences for multiple decision-makers, but the specifics of these “multi-actor” models remain unclear. This study addresses this gap by exploring how people prefer decisional authority to be balanced among elected politicians, citizens, (human) experts, and artificial intelligence-based technologies. Analyzing data from over 1500 UK citizens, we identified eight distinct clusters. Four of these clusters (30.8% of the sample) prefer one actor to be dominant in policy decisions (“dominant-actor” clusters), while the other four clusters (69.2% of the sample) prefer co-decision by two or more actors (“multiple-actor” clusters). Overall, the present findings highlight the complexity of decision-making preferences in democratic governance, revealing a strong tendency among citizens toward more “hybrid” decision-making models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251323406
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Do People Prefer to Be in Charge? An In-Depth Analysis of UK Citizens’ Preferences for Politicians, Citizens, Experts, and/or Artificial Intelligence in Policymaking

Arne Roets, Tessa Haesevoets, Bram Verschuere, Alain Van Hiel et al.
1 citations
Political Studies
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
8.52
article

Who Do People Prefer to Be in Charge? An In-Depth Analysis of UK Citizens’ Preferences for Politicians, Citizens, Experts, and/or Artificial Intelligence in Policymaking

Arne Roets, Tessa Haesevoets, Bram Verschuere, Alain Van Hiel, Kim Dierckx
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For a long time, research on democratic governance has primarily focused on preferences for singular decision-makers: elected politicians, citizens, or experts. Recently, however, there has been a shift toward considering preferences for multiple decision-makers, but the specifics of these “multi-actor” models remain unclear. This study addresses this gap by exploring how people prefer decisional authority to be balanced among elected politicians, citizens, (human) experts, and artificial intelligence-based technologies. Analyzing data from over 1500 UK citizens, we identified eight distinct clusters. Four of these clusters (30.8% of the sample) prefer one actor to be dominant in policy decisions (“dominant-actor” clusters), while the other four clusters (69.2% of the sample) prefer co-decision by two or more actors (“multiple-actor” clusters). Overall, the present findings highlight the complexity of decision-making preferences in democratic governance, revealing a strong tendency among citizens toward more “hybrid” decision-making models.

Political StudiesVol. 74(1)
Ghent University (BE)
Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.