Class Actions in Norway

The Article is dedicated to group action and group proceedings in Norway. It is not a secret, that regulation of group action in Norway has specific character. The research begins with the history of enactment of law on group proceedings in Norway. The Author concludes that prototype of group action such as Norwegian representative action existed in Norwegian law for long. Then the Author touches prerequisites of group action that the lawmaker used in Dispute Act, 2008. The Author analyzes the hybrid model of participation of group members in group proceedings, that combined optin and optout principles at the choice of the court. In addition, the author raises the following questions: position of group representative, judicial representation on collective disputes, court costs, appeal. The Author concludes that knowledge of Norwegian experience is also useful for our national lawmaker.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Arbitrazh-civil procedure
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2024-11-50-54
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Class Actions in Norway

Nikita A. Sutormin
Arbitrazh-civil procedure
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Class Actions in Norway

Nikita A. Sutormin
article en

Abstract

The Article is dedicated to group action and group proceedings in Norway. It is not a secret, that regulation of group action in Norway has specific character. The research begins with the history of enactment of law on group proceedings in Norway. The Author concludes that prototype of group action such as Norwegian representative action existed in Norwegian law for long. Then the Author touches prerequisites of group action that the lawmaker used in Dispute Act, 2008. The Author analyzes the hybrid model of participation of group members in group proceedings, that combined optin and optout principles at the choice of the court. In addition, the author raises the following questions: position of group representative, judicial representation on collective disputes, court costs, appeal. The Author concludes that knowledge of Norwegian experience is also useful for our national lawmaker.

Arbitrazh-civil procedure
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.