Judicial Representation Types

In the presented work, the reflections of scientists on the types of judicial representation are presented and analyzed; the semantic significance of existing distinctions on the basis of the emergence of judicial representation is revealed; a model of a new subspecies of judicial legitimate "professional" representation is presented. The main purpose of the article is to disclose the main existing types of judicial representation with the designation of their distinctive characteristics; to present for review a new subspecies of judicial legitimate "professional" representation. The presented article uses general (theoretical, universal), as well as specific (empirical and practical) research methods such as analysis, synthesis, generalization, analogy, classification, deduction and induction, and the comparative method. The main types of judicial representation are described in detail with the designation of their distinctive characteristics; a new subspecies of judicial representation is presented for review - legitimate "professional" representation. Its basic component, as in the case of legal representation, will be the entire list of aspects on which legal representation arises, and a distinctive feature in comparison with legal representation will be the circumstance of the transfer of powers to carry out representation from legal representatives to voluntarily authorized "professional" representatives.