Assessing Potential Land and Soil for Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) for United Nations (UN) Initiatives: An Example of the Contiguous United States of America (USA)

The concept of nature-based solutions (NBS) is widely promoted as an approach to effectively counteract climate change and land degradation (LD) as well as simultaneously add environmental and socio-economic benefits. To have a worldwide impact from NBS, it is important to consider potential land and soil resources at various scales, including administrative units (e.g., country, state, county, etc.). Nature-based solutions are considered by many United Nations (UN) initiatives, including the Paris Agreement and the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). Currently, there is no consensus on how to define NBS and their indicators. The innovation of this study is that it defines and evaluates soil- and land-based NBS potential while suggesting indicators for land- and soil-based NBS using the contiguous United States of America (USA) as an example. This study defines potential land for NBS as the sum of the individual satellite-identified areas of barren, shrub/scrub, and herbaceous land covers, which are linked to climate and inherent soil quality (SQ), so that NBS could be implemented without changing other land uses. The potential soil for NBS, based on SQ, is a subset of land available for potential NBS. As of 2021, anthropogenic LD affected 2,092,539.0 km2 in the contiguous USA, with 928,618.0 km2 (15.1% of the contiguous US area) of actual potential land for NBS. The contiguous USA had a negative balance between anthropogenic LD and actual potential land for NBS to compensate for anthropogenic LD of −1,163,921.0 km2. Thirty-seven states also exhibited a negative balance for LD compensation with Iowa having the worst balance of −124,497.0 km2. Many states with positive anthropogenic LD and NBS balances showed that most of the potential NBS land was of low SQ and, therefore, may not be suitable for NBS. Planning for NBS should involve a feasibility analysis of “nationally determined NBS” (NDNBS) through site and context-specific NBS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/earth6010017
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Potential Land and Soil for Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) for United Nations (UN) Initiatives: An Example of the Contiguous United States of America (USA)

George B. Shepherd, Gregory C. Post, Hamdi A. Zurqani, Elena A. Mikhailova et al.
1 citations
Earth
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

Assessing Potential Land and Soil for Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) for United Nations (UN) Initiatives: An Example of the Contiguous United States of America (USA)

George B. Shepherd, Gregory C. Post, Hamdi A. Zurqani, Elena A. Mikhailova, Zhenbang Hao, Mark A. Schlautman, Lili Lin, Leslie Roberts, Christopher J. Post, Lauren N. Landis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The concept of nature-based solutions (NBS) is widely promoted as an approach to effectively counteract climate change and land degradation (LD) as well as simultaneously add environmental and socio-economic benefits. To have a worldwide impact from NBS, it is important to consider potential land and soil resources at various scales, including administrative units (e.g., country, state, county, etc.). Nature-based solutions are considered by many United Nations (UN) initiatives, including the Paris Agreement and the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). Currently, there is no consensus on how to define NBS and their indicators. The innovation of this study is that it defines and evaluates soil- and land-based NBS potential while suggesting indicators for land- and soil-based NBS using the contiguous United States of America (USA) as an example. This study defines potential land for NBS as the sum of the individual satellite-identified areas of barren, shrub/scrub, and herbaceous land covers, which are linked to climate and inherent soil quality (SQ), so that NBS could be implemented without changing other land uses. The potential soil for NBS, based on SQ, is a subset of land available for potential NBS. As of 2021, anthropogenic LD affected 2,092,539.0 km2 in the contiguous USA, with 928,618.0 km2 (15.1% of the contiguous US area) of actual potential land for NBS. The contiguous USA had a negative balance between anthropogenic LD and actual potential land for NBS to compensate for anthropogenic LD of −1,163,921.0 km2. Thirty-seven states also exhibited a negative balance for LD compensation with Iowa having the worst balance of −124,497.0 km2. Many states with positive anthropogenic LD and NBS balances showed that most of the potential NBS land was of low SQ and, therefore, may not be suitable for NBS. Planning for NBS should involve a feasibility analysis of “nationally determined NBS” (NDNBS) through site and context-specific NBS.

EarthVol. 6(1)
Emory University (US), University of Arkansas at Monticello (US), Clemson University (US), Minnan Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.