Evaluation Workflows for Large Language Models (LLMs) that Integrate Domain Expertise for Complex Knowledge Tasks

The growing use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in specialized fields such as healthcare, nutrition, and education has raised critical concerns regarding the accuracy, reliability, and contextual appropriateness of LLM outputs.However, evaluating LLMs is challenging due to the complexity of the information and the need for human input, which is often costly and resource-intensive.My dissertation addresses the challenges in integrating domain expertise into the evaluation of LLM outputs for complex knowledge tasks to build more efficient evaluation workflows.The main objectives of this research are: 1) to investigate when and at what stage domain expertise should be integrated into LLM evaluation 2) to explore the role of domain experts compared to other evaluators such as lay users and LLMs themselves in the evaluation process, and 3) to design evaluation frameworks and tools that guide both the optimal integration of domain experts and leverage the complementary strengths of other evaluation groups.The expected impact of this research includes advancing the design of LLM evaluation tools and workflows that assist developers in identifying where expertise is needed to effectively develop and deploy LLMs in real-world applications. CCS Concepts

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3708557.3716146
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation Workflows for Large Language Models (LLMs) that Integrate Domain Expertise for Complex Knowledge Tasks

Annalisa Szymanski
2 citations
Topic Modeling
4.96
article

Evaluation Workflows for Large Language Models (LLMs) that Integrate Domain Expertise for Complex Knowledge Tasks

Annalisa Szymanski
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The growing use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in specialized fields such as healthcare, nutrition, and education has raised critical concerns regarding the accuracy, reliability, and contextual appropriateness of LLM outputs.However, evaluating LLMs is challenging due to the complexity of the information and the need for human input, which is often costly and resource-intensive.My dissertation addresses the challenges in integrating domain expertise into the evaluation of LLM outputs for complex knowledge tasks to build more efficient evaluation workflows.The main objectives of this research are: 1) to investigate when and at what stage domain expertise should be integrated into LLM evaluation 2) to explore the role of domain experts compared to other evaluators such as lay users and LLMs themselves in the evaluation process, and 3) to design evaluation frameworks and tools that guide both the optimal integration of domain experts and leverage the complementary strengths of other evaluation groups.The expected impact of this research includes advancing the design of LLM evaluation tools and workflows that assist developers in identifying where expertise is needed to effectively develop and deploy LLMs in real-world applications. CCS Concepts

University of Notre Dame (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Topic Modeling
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.