8 What matters most?: A longitudinal exploration of the end-of-life preferences of people over 85 living with frailty

<h3>Background</h3> Understanding how end-of-life preferences evolve over time is essential for dynamic and person-centred advance care planning. This is particularly important for older people living with frailty, who can have an unpredictable illness course or incompletely expressed preferences. Investigating how the wishes of older people with frailty develop over time will inform the future direction of advance care planning for this under-researched population. <h3>Methods</h3> Using constructivist grounded theory methods, this longitudinal qualitative interview study explored the end-of-life preferences of people aged over 85 living with frailty. Thirteen Primary Care patients were recruited using purposive and theoretical sampling. Participants were interviewed 1–3 times over 3–18 months. Two caregivers, who were bereaved during the study period, were also interviewed. Constant comparative analysis was used to develop theoretical categories, which were grounded in the qualitative interview data. <h3>Results</h3> This study found that contemplating, expressing and negotiating end-of-life preferences over time was a dynamic process, where preferences were held with uncertainty. Participants often envisaged their options narrowing to the point where they would ‘have no choice’ and rarely felt empowered to take part in healthcare decision making. People’s priorities for end-of-life care were influenced by a wish to maintain their individual identity for as long as possible. It was important to participants that this enduring sense of self was known and respected by those caring for them at end of life. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Our findings show that the predominant model of decision-based advance care planning is problematic for older people living with frailty. This study supports a growing call for a broader approach, shifting to preparation for end of life rather than planning. Focussing on an individual’s sense of self, and how this influences their wishes, will enhance this approach, promoting the delivery of truly person-centred end-of-life care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral Presentations
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-pcc.8
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

8 What matters most?: A longitudinal exploration of the end-of-life preferences of people over 85 living with frailty

Barbara Hanratty, Lucy Robinson, Paul Paes, Katie Frew
Oral Presentations
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

8 What matters most?: A longitudinal exploration of the end-of-life preferences of people over 85 living with frailty

Barbara Hanratty, Lucy Robinson, Paul Paes, Katie Frew
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Understanding how end-of-life preferences evolve over time is essential for dynamic and person-centred advance care planning. This is particularly important for older people living with frailty, who can have an unpredictable illness course or incompletely expressed preferences. Investigating how the wishes of older people with frailty develop over time will inform the future direction of advance care planning for this under-researched population. <h3>Methods</h3> Using constructivist grounded theory methods, this longitudinal qualitative interview study explored the end-of-life preferences of people aged over 85 living with frailty. Thirteen Primary Care patients were recruited using purposive and theoretical sampling. Participants were interviewed 1–3 times over 3–18 months. Two caregivers, who were bereaved during the study period, were also interviewed. Constant comparative analysis was used to develop theoretical categories, which were grounded in the qualitative interview data. <h3>Results</h3> This study found that contemplating, expressing and negotiating end-of-life preferences over time was a dynamic process, where preferences were held with uncertainty. Participants often envisaged their options narrowing to the point where they would ‘have no choice’ and rarely felt empowered to take part in healthcare decision making. People’s priorities for end-of-life care were influenced by a wish to maintain their individual identity for as long as possible. It was important to participants that this enduring sense of self was known and respected by those caring for them at end of life. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Our findings show that the predominant model of decision-based advance care planning is problematic for older people living with frailty. This study supports a growing call for a broader approach, shifting to preparation for end of life rather than planning. Focussing on an individual’s sense of self, and how this influences their wishes, will enhance this approach, promoting the delivery of truly person-centred end-of-life care.

Oral Presentations
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Northumbria University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.