69 Prolonged disorders of consciousness: practice described by palliative and rehabilitation physicians

<h3>Introduction</h3> National clinical guidelines for the management of prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC) following sudden onset brain injury were updated in 2020. Since the supreme court judgement in 2018, clinical knowledge and management skills have grown. This paper reports current practice. <h3>Methods</h3> A questionnaire was developed, tested and circulated to rehabilitation and palliative medicine specialists, via British Society of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation and Association of Palliative Medicine. Anonymised results and data analysis were stored securely on an NHS server. <h3>Results</h3> 63.5% (n=61) of respondents were involved in the care of people with PDOC, two thirds working in palliative medicine. 44% of clinicians withdraw clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in the patient’s usual place of care. Where a decision to admit is taken, 43% will admit to a hospice inpatient unit. 87% of respondents do not arrange long line or central intravenous access prior to withdrawal of CANH. 95% of clinicians prescribe opioids and 92% prescribe sedatives for prn use or directly convert oral/enteral doses to a continuous subcutaneous infusion when withdrawing CANH. Most clinicians titrate according to need. In 81% of cases there was no difficulty with symptom management on withdrawal of CANH. Difficulties encountered included interpretation of movement and symptom assessment (3), care setting (2), agitation (2), thirst (1) and severe secretion burden (1), seizures (1). 48% of respondents worked with staff who expressed a conscientious objection to withdrawal of CANH, 40% in palliative and 66% in rehabilitation medicine. <h3>Conclusion</h3> National guidance should be updated to reflect clinical practice, regarding place of care, the effectiveness of a subcutaneous route and the use of proportionate symptom management. Clinicians caring for people with PDOC should be familiar with the presentation of physiological hyperactivity, symptom assessment in this context, and understand how to escalate concerns. Further research is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poster presentations
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-pcc.88
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

69 Prolonged disorders of consciousness: practice described by palliative and rehabilitation physicians

Mary Miller, Tim Harrison, Anton Pick, Siobhan Barrie
Poster presentations
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

69 Prolonged disorders of consciousness: practice described by palliative and rehabilitation physicians

Mary Miller, Tim Harrison, Anton Pick, Siobhan Barrie
article en

Abstract

<h3>Introduction</h3> National clinical guidelines for the management of prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC) following sudden onset brain injury were updated in 2020. Since the supreme court judgement in 2018, clinical knowledge and management skills have grown. This paper reports current practice. <h3>Methods</h3> A questionnaire was developed, tested and circulated to rehabilitation and palliative medicine specialists, via British Society of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation and Association of Palliative Medicine. Anonymised results and data analysis were stored securely on an NHS server. <h3>Results</h3> 63.5% (n=61) of respondents were involved in the care of people with PDOC, two thirds working in palliative medicine. 44% of clinicians withdraw clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in the patient’s usual place of care. Where a decision to admit is taken, 43% will admit to a hospice inpatient unit. 87% of respondents do not arrange long line or central intravenous access prior to withdrawal of CANH. 95% of clinicians prescribe opioids and 92% prescribe sedatives for prn use or directly convert oral/enteral doses to a continuous subcutaneous infusion when withdrawing CANH. Most clinicians titrate according to need. In 81% of cases there was no difficulty with symptom management on withdrawal of CANH. Difficulties encountered included interpretation of movement and symptom assessment (3), care setting (2), agitation (2), thirst (1) and severe secretion burden (1), seizures (1). 48% of respondents worked with staff who expressed a conscientious objection to withdrawal of CANH, 40% in palliative and 66% in rehabilitation medicine. <h3>Conclusion</h3> National guidance should be updated to reflect clinical practice, regarding place of care, the effectiveness of a subcutaneous route and the use of proportionate symptom management. Clinicians caring for people with PDOC should be familiar with the presentation of physiological hyperactivity, symptom assessment in this context, and understand how to escalate concerns. Further research is needed.

Poster presentations
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.