168 PiPS-B prognostic scoring for consideration of intrathecal pump insertion: a local audit

<h3>Introduction</h3> Intrathecal morphine pumps (ITMP) are used for cancer pain and are considered economically viable for patients likely to live for ≥6 months. Locally, patients are referred for ITMP by oncologists, with a threshold of ≥6 month predicted survival used as a referral criterion. The Prognosis in Palliative Care Study – B (PiPS-B) tool was designed to predict survival in patients with incurable cancer. We sought to understand whether PiPS-B could accurately predict prognosis for patients with a cancer diagnosis being considered for ITMP insertion, to help utilise ITMP appropriately in our local centre. <h3>Methodology</h3> We performed a prospective audit. PiPS-B prognostic scoring was completed for all patients with a cancer diagnosis undergoing ITMP insertion between April 2023 and April 2024. PiPS-B predictions of ‘days/weeks/months’ plus 56-day survival probabilities were generated for each patient and compared to actual 6-month survival. <h3>Results</h3> 8 patients with cancer diagnoses underwent ITMP insertion. Oncologist prognosis estimate was ‘≥6 months’ for all 8 patients. PiPS-B prediction was ‘months’ for 7 patients (with PiPS-B 56-day survival prediction of &gt;80% for all 7), and ‘weeks’ for 1 patient (PiPS-B 56-day survival prediction of 28%). 2/8 patients died within 6 months post-ITMP insertion. 1 patient (predicted ‘weeks’ by PiPS-B) died 11 weeks post-ITMP insertion of cancer-related complications. 1 patient (predicted ‘months’ by PiPS-B) died 3 weeks post-ITMP insertion of an acute intercurrent illness. <h3>Conclusion</h3> PiPS-B was as accurate as clinical opinion at predicting survival in patients undergoing ITMP insertion and may have helped to identify one of the patients who died within 6 months of ITMP insertion. Based on our experience, we suggest that oncology services consider completing PiPS-B prognostic scoring before referral for ITMP, with further consideration of appropriateness of referral when PiPS-B suggests &lt;50% 56-day survival probability or prognosis of ‘weeks’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poster presentations
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-pcc.186
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

168 PiPS-B prognostic scoring for consideration of intrathecal pump insertion: a local audit

Somnath Bagchi, Jenny Sterry
1 links
Poster presentations
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

168 PiPS-B prognostic scoring for consideration of intrathecal pump insertion: a local audit

Somnath Bagchi, Jenny Sterry
article en

Abstract

<h3>Introduction</h3> Intrathecal morphine pumps (ITMP) are used for cancer pain and are considered economically viable for patients likely to live for ≥6 months. Locally, patients are referred for ITMP by oncologists, with a threshold of ≥6 month predicted survival used as a referral criterion. The Prognosis in Palliative Care Study – B (PiPS-B) tool was designed to predict survival in patients with incurable cancer. We sought to understand whether PiPS-B could accurately predict prognosis for patients with a cancer diagnosis being considered for ITMP insertion, to help utilise ITMP appropriately in our local centre. <h3>Methodology</h3> We performed a prospective audit. PiPS-B prognostic scoring was completed for all patients with a cancer diagnosis undergoing ITMP insertion between April 2023 and April 2024. PiPS-B predictions of ‘days/weeks/months’ plus 56-day survival probabilities were generated for each patient and compared to actual 6-month survival. <h3>Results</h3> 8 patients with cancer diagnoses underwent ITMP insertion. Oncologist prognosis estimate was ‘≥6 months’ for all 8 patients. PiPS-B prediction was ‘months’ for 7 patients (with PiPS-B 56-day survival prediction of &gt;80% for all 7), and ‘weeks’ for 1 patient (PiPS-B 56-day survival prediction of 28%). 2/8 patients died within 6 months post-ITMP insertion. 1 patient (predicted ‘weeks’ by PiPS-B) died 11 weeks post-ITMP insertion of cancer-related complications. 1 patient (predicted ‘months’ by PiPS-B) died 3 weeks post-ITMP insertion of an acute intercurrent illness. <h3>Conclusion</h3> PiPS-B was as accurate as clinical opinion at predicting survival in patients undergoing ITMP insertion and may have helped to identify one of the patients who died within 6 months of ITMP insertion. Based on our experience, we suggest that oncology services consider completing PiPS-B prognostic scoring before referral for ITMP, with further consideration of appropriateness of referral when PiPS-B suggests &lt;50% 56-day survival probability or prognosis of ‘weeks’.

Poster presentations
University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

168 PiPS-B prognostic scoring for consideration of intrathecal pump insertion: a local audit — Somnath Bagchi, Jenny Sterry · Poster presentations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS