115 Palliative and end-of-life-care (PEoLC) virtual wards: A cross-sectional uk survey highlighting models of care, benefits and challenges

<h3>Background</h3> Virtual wards are part of NHS England’s strategy to reduce hospital admissions. Innovative providers have piloted virtual wards to support palliative patients. This UK survey sought to collect aggregated data about palliative and end-of-life-care (PEoLC) virtual wards. <h3>Method</h3> A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to UK palliative care providers using a multi-level, snowballing methodology. 86 responses were received. <h3>Results</h3> We heard from 20 palliative care providers running 22 PEoLC virtual wards. Models of care differ, but all services support patients with unstable palliative care symptoms who would otherwise need hospital or hospice admission (100%). Some provide step-down care after discharge from hospital (72%) or A&amp;E (69%). Most services rely on specialist nurses and palliative care consultant input daily. A few have regular input from therapists (23%) and pharmacists (17%), which is reported as valuable. Most providers recruited additional staff (65%). Providers use telephone (100%), face-to-face contact (93%) and video consultations (69%), rarely using remote-monitoring technology (15%). As well as reducing hospital admissions, virtual wards were reported to facilitate patient choice and support for loved ones. Respondents reported longer-term funding difficulties for their services. 75% rely on charitable funding and two services have closed due to lack of funds. Some disapproved of measuring the worth of services solely in terms of hospital bed days saved. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Early reports show that PEoLC virtual wards can prevent hospital admissions and save money. They are increasing in number; 25% of respondents are considering launching one. This survey details varying models of care, and reports positive outcomes for patients, carers and staff. It is important that these outcomes are highlighted to commissioners. PEoLC virtual wards resemble frailty models with an emphasis on face-to-face rather than technology-enabled care. Integrated services within a wider virtual ward show promise, but are currently in the minority (32%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poster presentations
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-pcc.133
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

115 Palliative and end-of-life-care (PEoLC) virtual wards: A cross-sectional uk survey highlighting models of care, benefits and challenges

Hannah Lucy May-Miller
Poster presentations
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

115 Palliative and end-of-life-care (PEoLC) virtual wards: A cross-sectional uk survey highlighting models of care, benefits and challenges

Hannah Lucy May-Miller
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Virtual wards are part of NHS England’s strategy to reduce hospital admissions. Innovative providers have piloted virtual wards to support palliative patients. This UK survey sought to collect aggregated data about palliative and end-of-life-care (PEoLC) virtual wards. <h3>Method</h3> A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to UK palliative care providers using a multi-level, snowballing methodology. 86 responses were received. <h3>Results</h3> We heard from 20 palliative care providers running 22 PEoLC virtual wards. Models of care differ, but all services support patients with unstable palliative care symptoms who would otherwise need hospital or hospice admission (100%). Some provide step-down care after discharge from hospital (72%) or A&amp;E (69%). Most services rely on specialist nurses and palliative care consultant input daily. A few have regular input from therapists (23%) and pharmacists (17%), which is reported as valuable. Most providers recruited additional staff (65%). Providers use telephone (100%), face-to-face contact (93%) and video consultations (69%), rarely using remote-monitoring technology (15%). As well as reducing hospital admissions, virtual wards were reported to facilitate patient choice and support for loved ones. Respondents reported longer-term funding difficulties for their services. 75% rely on charitable funding and two services have closed due to lack of funds. Some disapproved of measuring the worth of services solely in terms of hospital bed days saved. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Early reports show that PEoLC virtual wards can prevent hospital admissions and save money. They are increasing in number; 25% of respondents are considering launching one. This survey details varying models of care, and reports positive outcomes for patients, carers and staff. It is important that these outcomes are highlighted to commissioners. PEoLC virtual wards resemble frailty models with an emphasis on face-to-face rather than technology-enabled care. Integrated services within a wider virtual ward show promise, but are currently in the minority (32%).

Poster presentations
Croydon Health Services NHS Trust (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.