174 Audit of moving and handling documentation for patients with suspected metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC)

<h3>Background and Intro</h3> Appropriate moving and handling (M&amp;H) recommendations for patients with suspected metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) reduces potential to cause harm by avoiding unsafe movement, especially with spinal instability. The aim was to identify ways of improving communication of M&amp;H advice within our Specialist Inpatient Palliative Care Units (PCU). <h3>Method</h3> Patients were identified by reviewing those who had an MRI request including the words ‘’MSCC’ and those who were an inpatient on the PCU during their admission. Data was taken over a 3-year period between January 2018-October 2021. A total of 28 patients notes were reviewed retrospectively against a five-question audit tool based upon Trust and NICE Guidelines. Interventions were put in place which aimed to improve practice, including education of nurses, physiotherapists, and doctors, along with aide memoires (covering the symptoms of and actions needed in suspected MSCC). Re-audit 36-months later identified a total of 31 patients who had an MRI for suspected MSCC and who were on a PCU, following the same method and review process, from October 2021-April 2024. <h3>Results</h3> During the initial audit, 86% of the notes suggested MSCC was suspected with only 11% having a M&amp;H recommendation documented for the wider team to follow. The re-audit shows 84% suspected MSCC with 20% having a M&amp;H recommendation clearly documented. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Documentation is required to recommend appropriate M&amp;H for all staff involved in patient care. The re-audit demonstrates slight improvements but remains below recommended standards. Ongoing education to consider spinal instability while managing MSCC is critical to prevent patient harm through inappropriate movement before definitive treatment. Although the audit did not set out to review outcomes when MSCC best practice guidance was not followed, no serious adverse events were identified during the process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poster presentations
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-pcc.192
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

174 Audit of moving and handling documentation for patients with suspected metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC)

Emma McDougall, Leigh Hale, Katie Frew, Julia Johnson et al.
Poster presentations
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

174 Audit of moving and handling documentation for patients with suspected metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC)

Emma McDougall, Leigh Hale, Katie Frew, Julia Johnson, Lisa Lish, Marie Duke
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background and Intro</h3> Appropriate moving and handling (M&amp;H) recommendations for patients with suspected metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) reduces potential to cause harm by avoiding unsafe movement, especially with spinal instability. The aim was to identify ways of improving communication of M&amp;H advice within our Specialist Inpatient Palliative Care Units (PCU). <h3>Method</h3> Patients were identified by reviewing those who had an MRI request including the words ‘’MSCC’ and those who were an inpatient on the PCU during their admission. Data was taken over a 3-year period between January 2018-October 2021. A total of 28 patients notes were reviewed retrospectively against a five-question audit tool based upon Trust and NICE Guidelines. Interventions were put in place which aimed to improve practice, including education of nurses, physiotherapists, and doctors, along with aide memoires (covering the symptoms of and actions needed in suspected MSCC). Re-audit 36-months later identified a total of 31 patients who had an MRI for suspected MSCC and who were on a PCU, following the same method and review process, from October 2021-April 2024. <h3>Results</h3> During the initial audit, 86% of the notes suggested MSCC was suspected with only 11% having a M&amp;H recommendation documented for the wider team to follow. The re-audit shows 84% suspected MSCC with 20% having a M&amp;H recommendation clearly documented. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Documentation is required to recommend appropriate M&amp;H for all staff involved in patient care. The re-audit demonstrates slight improvements but remains below recommended standards. Ongoing education to consider spinal instability while managing MSCC is critical to prevent patient harm through inappropriate movement before definitive treatment. Although the audit did not set out to review outcomes when MSCC best practice guidance was not followed, no serious adverse events were identified during the process.

Poster presentations
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.