Reliability of an all-in-one wearable sensor for continuous vital signs monitoring in high-risk patients: the NIGHTINGALE clinical validation study

Continuous vital signs monitoring with wearable systems may improve early recognition of patient deterioration on hospital wards. The objective of this study was to determine whether the wearable Checkpoint Cardio's CPC12S, can accurately measure heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), blood pressure (BP) and temperature continuously. In an observational multicenter method comparison study of 70 high-risk surgical patients admitted to high-dependency wards; HR, RR, SpO2, BP and temperature were simultaneously measured with the CPC12S system and with ICU-grade monitoring systems in four European hospitals. Outcome measures were bias and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). Clinical accuracy was assessed with Clarke Error Grid analyses for HR and RR. A total of 3,212 h of vital signs data (on average 26 h per patient) were analyzed. For HR, bias (95% LoA) of the pooled analysis was 0.0 (-3.5 to 3.4), for RR 1.5 (-3.7 to 7.5) and for SpO2 0.4 (-3.1 to 4.0). The CPC12S system overestimated BP, with a bias of 8.9 and wide LoA (-23.3 to 41.2). Temperature was underestimated with a bias of -0.6 and LoA of -1.7 to 0.6. Clarke Error Grid analyses showed that adequate treatment decisions regarding changes in HR and RR would have been made in 99.2% and 92.0% of cases respectively. The CPC12S system showed high accuracy for measurements of HR. The accuracy of RR, SpO2 were slightly overestimated and core temperature underestimated, with LoA outside the predefined clinical acceptable range. The accuracy of BP was unacceptably low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01279-x
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability of an all-in-one wearable sensor for continuous vital signs monitoring in high-risk patients: the NIGHTINGALE clinical validation study

Frank Rademakers, Daniel Hertzberg, Martine J. M. Breteler, Max Bell et al.
7 citations
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
4.72
article

Reliability of an all-in-one wearable sensor for continuous vital signs monitoring in high-risk patients: the NIGHTINGALE clinical validation study

Frank Rademakers, Daniel Hertzberg, Martine J. M. Breteler, Max Bell, David Brealey, David Benjamin Konrad, Cor J. Kalkman, Sebastian Fritsch, Ellen Leigard, John R Welch, Heleen Rienstra, Lisa C. Hartung
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Continuous vital signs monitoring with wearable systems may improve early recognition of patient deterioration on hospital wards. The objective of this study was to determine whether the wearable Checkpoint Cardio's CPC12S, can accurately measure heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), blood pressure (BP) and temperature continuously. In an observational multicenter method comparison study of 70 high-risk surgical patients admitted to high-dependency wards; HR, RR, SpO2, BP and temperature were simultaneously measured with the CPC12S system and with ICU-grade monitoring systems in four European hospitals. Outcome measures were bias and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). Clinical accuracy was assessed with Clarke Error Grid analyses for HR and RR. A total of 3,212 h of vital signs data (on average 26 h per patient) were analyzed. For HR, bias (95% LoA) of the pooled analysis was 0.0 (-3.5 to 3.4), for RR 1.5 (-3.7 to 7.5) and for SpO2 0.4 (-3.1 to 4.0). The CPC12S system overestimated BP, with a bias of 8.9 and wide LoA (-23.3 to 41.2). Temperature was underestimated with a bias of -0.6 and LoA of -1.7 to 0.6. Clarke Error Grid analyses showed that adequate treatment decisions regarding changes in HR and RR would have been made in 99.2% and 92.0% of cases respectively. The CPC12S system showed high accuracy for measurements of HR. The accuracy of RR, SpO2 were slightly overestimated and core temperature underestimated, with LoA outside the predefined clinical acceptable range. The accuracy of BP was unacceptably low.

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and ComputingVol. 39(5)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Utrecht University (NL), Karolinska Institutet (SE), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), UCL Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University College London (GB), RWTH Aachen University (DE), KU Leuven (BE)
European Commission
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
4.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.