Meaningful, useful and legitimate information in the use of index numbers for decision making

Abstract Often information relevant to a decision is summarized in an index number. This paper explores conditions under which conclusions using index numbers are relevant to the decision that needs to be made. Specifically, it explores the idea that a statement using scales of measurement is meaningful in the sense that its truth or falsity does not depend on an arbitrary choice of parameters; the concept that a conclusion using index numbers is useful for the specific decision that needs to be made; and the notion that such a conclusion is legitimate in the sense that it is collected and used in a way that satisfies cultural, historical, organizational, and legal constraints. While meaningfulness is a precisely defined concept, usefulness and legitimacy are not, and the paper explores properties of these concepts that lay the groundwork for making them more precise. Many examples involving two well-known and widely-used index numbers, body mass indices and air pollution indices, are used to explore the properties of and interrelationships among meaningfulness, usefulness, and legitimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality & Quantity
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02113-x
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meaningful, useful and legitimate information in the use of index numbers for decision making

Fred S. Roberts, Alexis Tsoukiàs, Helen Roberts
Quality & Quantity
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Meaningful, useful and legitimate information in the use of index numbers for decision making

Fred S. Roberts, Alexis Tsoukiàs, Helen Roberts
article en

Abstract

Abstract Often information relevant to a decision is summarized in an index number. This paper explores conditions under which conclusions using index numbers are relevant to the decision that needs to be made. Specifically, it explores the idea that a statement using scales of measurement is meaningful in the sense that its truth or falsity does not depend on an arbitrary choice of parameters; the concept that a conclusion using index numbers is useful for the specific decision that needs to be made; and the notion that such a conclusion is legitimate in the sense that it is collected and used in a way that satisfies cultural, historical, organizational, and legal constraints. While meaningfulness is a precisely defined concept, usefulness and legitimacy are not, and the paper explores properties of these concepts that lay the groundwork for making them more precise. Many examples involving two well-known and widely-used index numbers, body mass indices and air pollution indices, are used to explore the properties of and interrelationships among meaningfulness, usefulness, and legitimacy.

Quality & QuantityVol. 59(4)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Montclair State University (US), Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science (US), Université Paris Dauphine-PSL (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Meaningful, useful and legitimate information in the use of index numbers for decision making — Fred S. Roberts, Alexis Tsoukiàs, et al. · Quality & Quantity (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS