Number marking in L2 English of the speakers of two classifier languages

Abstract This paper explores the number marking challenges faced by L2 learners of English whose L1 is one of the classifier languages Mandarin Chinese (henceforth Chinese) or Bahasa Indonesia (henceforth Indonesian). It examines whether these groups differ in their marking of English number, and how the speaker’s level of proficiency, as well as linguistic factors including countability, concreteness, and determiner use, interact and influence their performance. The present study differs from previous studies in that it offers unique insights from authentic spoken data. The authors extracted 4000 tokens from the Chinese and Indonesian spoken monolog components in the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE), involving 150 Chinese-speaking and 100 Indonesian-speaking learners across beginner and intermediate proficiency; the tokens were part-of-speech tagged and annotated. Although the analysis, using mixed-effects binomial logistic regression, revealed no performance differences between the groups and no significant proficiency effects, the study found a strong relationship between ungrammatical number marking and count nouns, particularly abstract count nouns (e.g., taking part-time job ), as well as the absence of determiners (e.g., smoking in restaurant ). These findings confirm that learners from classifier languages face significant challenges with count nouns and that inaccurate number marking often occurs where nouns appear unmarked for number in their L1. The paper concludes with pedagogical suggestions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.24006.yao
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Number marking in L2 English of the speakers of two classifier languages

David Wijaya, Dongmei Yao
1 citations
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
3.44
article

Number marking in L2 English of the speakers of two classifier languages

David Wijaya, Dongmei Yao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the number marking challenges faced by L2 learners of English whose L1 is one of the classifier languages Mandarin Chinese (henceforth Chinese) or Bahasa Indonesia (henceforth Indonesian). It examines whether these groups differ in their marking of English number, and how the speaker’s level of proficiency, as well as linguistic factors including countability, concreteness, and determiner use, interact and influence their performance. The present study differs from previous studies in that it offers unique insights from authentic spoken data. The authors extracted 4000 tokens from the Chinese and Indonesian spoken monolog components in the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE), involving 150 Chinese-speaking and 100 Indonesian-speaking learners across beginner and intermediate proficiency; the tokens were part-of-speech tagged and annotated. Although the analysis, using mixed-effects binomial logistic regression, revealed no performance differences between the groups and no significant proficiency effects, the study found a strong relationship between ungrammatical number marking and count nouns, particularly abstract count nouns (e.g., taking part-time job ), as well as the absence of determiners (e.g., smoking in restaurant ). These findings confirm that learners from classifier languages face significant challenges with count nouns and that inaccurate number marking often occurs where nouns appear unmarked for number in their L1. The paper concludes with pedagogical suggestions.

Australian Review of Applied LinguisticsVol. 48(2)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), UCLouvain Saint-Louis Brussels (BE), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Number marking in L2 English of the speakers of two classifier languages — David Wijaya, Dongmei Yao · Australian Review of Applied Linguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS