Assessment of the Energy Efficiency and Cost of Low-Income Housing Based on BIM Considering Material Properties and Energy Modeling in a Tropical Climate

This work analyzes the potential impact of thirteen passive and active factors on a low-income housing (LIH) model in a tropical climate. For this purpose, a study of material properties and energy modeling using Building Information Modelling (BIM) is carried out, which helps to evaluate these factors’ energetic and economic implications. Two significant assessments are highlighted, namely active and passive factor analysis and dominant factor analysis. The research studied the architectural design of a one-story house measuring thirty-six square meters outlined by the Ecuadorian Construction Standard (NEC) chapter 15 part 4. A 3D architectural model was generated using Revit 2024 simulation software and subsequently employed to establish an energy model used in Autodesk Insight Software 2024 to assess the factors influencing energy consumption and annual energy expenses. The analysis included a comparison with a model of the house based on the ASHRAE 90.2 standard. The active and passive factors were ranked according to their impact on energy efficiency in the model. The results show that Energy Use Intensity (EUI) has a higher reduction for the ASHRAE model of 4.63%, with 21.60% for the Energy cost. The active factors exhibited a greater impact on the energy performance of the LIH than the passive factors, with the PV-Surface coverage being the factor that generated the highest EUI reduction, with 39.66% and 78.51% for both models. The study concluded by emphasizing the importance of adopting active strategies to achieve energy efficiency and economical house design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18061500
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Energy Efficiency and Cost of Low-Income Housing Based on BIM Considering Material Properties and Energy Modeling in a Tropical Climate

Guillermo Soriano, Julio Barzola–Monteses, Rubén Hidalgo-León, Vicente Macas-Espinosa et al.
2 citations
Energies
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
2.01
article

Assessment of the Energy Efficiency and Cost of Low-Income Housing Based on BIM Considering Material Properties and Energy Modeling in a Tropical Climate

Guillermo Soriano, Julio Barzola–Monteses, Rubén Hidalgo-León, Vicente Macas-Espinosa, David Gomez, Israel Portilla-Sanchez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This work analyzes the potential impact of thirteen passive and active factors on a low-income housing (LIH) model in a tropical climate. For this purpose, a study of material properties and energy modeling using Building Information Modelling (BIM) is carried out, which helps to evaluate these factors’ energetic and economic implications. Two significant assessments are highlighted, namely active and passive factor analysis and dominant factor analysis. The research studied the architectural design of a one-story house measuring thirty-six square meters outlined by the Ecuadorian Construction Standard (NEC) chapter 15 part 4. A 3D architectural model was generated using Revit 2024 simulation software and subsequently employed to establish an energy model used in Autodesk Insight Software 2024 to assess the factors influencing energy consumption and annual energy expenses. The analysis included a comparison with a model of the house based on the ASHRAE 90.2 standard. The active and passive factors were ranked according to their impact on energy efficiency in the model. The results show that Energy Use Intensity (EUI) has a higher reduction for the ASHRAE model of 4.63%, with 21.60% for the Energy cost. The active factors exhibited a greater impact on the energy performance of the LIH than the passive factors, with the PV-Surface coverage being the factor that generated the highest EUI reduction, with 39.66% and 78.51% for both models. The study concluded by emphasizing the importance of adopting active strategies to achieve energy efficiency and economical house design.

EnergiesVol. 18(6)
Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (EC), University of Guayaquil (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.