Enhancing Microgrid Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of Forecasting Techniques for Load Demand Prediction

This study compared three machine learning techniques - Ridge Regression, ARIMA, and Random Forest Regression - to forecast short-term electricity demand in a Nigerian university microgrid. The goal was to identify the most accurate method for predicting the university's power needs 24 hours ahead. Six years of historical load data and weather information were used to train and evaluate the models. Random Forest Regression (RFR) emerged as the clear winner, achieving a significant improvement in accuracy compared to both Ridge Regression (RG) and ARIMA. Notably, RFR offered a 45% reduction in Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and a 33% decrease in Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) compared to RG. These results suggest that RFR provides the most precise predictions for university electricity demand in this scenario

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4314/fuoyejet.v9i3.7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Microgrid Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of Forecasting Techniques for Load Demand Prediction

B.I Gwaivangmin, Abdullahi Lanre Amoo, G. A. Bakare, Yau Shuaibu Haruna
1 citations
FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
0.21
article

Enhancing Microgrid Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of Forecasting Techniques for Load Demand Prediction

B.I Gwaivangmin, Abdullahi Lanre Amoo, G. A. Bakare, Yau Shuaibu Haruna
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study compared three machine learning techniques - Ridge Regression, ARIMA, and Random Forest Regression - to forecast short-term electricity demand in a Nigerian university microgrid. The goal was to identify the most accurate method for predicting the university's power needs 24 hours ahead. Six years of historical load data and weather information were used to train and evaluate the models. Random Forest Regression (RFR) emerged as the clear winner, achieving a significant improvement in accuracy compared to both Ridge Regression (RG) and ARIMA. Notably, RFR offered a 45% reduction in Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and a 33% decrease in Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) compared to RG. These results suggest that RFR provides the most precise predictions for university electricity demand in this scenario

FUOYE Journal of Engineering and TechnologyVol. 9(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.