Effects of High‐Latitude Input on Neutral Wind Structure and Forcing During the 17 March 2013 Storm

Abstract In this study, a quantitative assessment of the thermospheric wind forcing and its dependence on high‐latitude drivers is provided. Due to its coupling with the ionosphere via ion‐neutral collisions, the simulated neutral wind and the corresponding thermospheric forcing from Global Circulation Models (GCMs) are highly dependent on the model’s high‐latitude ionospheric input. To study the effects of the different ionospheric inputs, we simulate the thermospheric winds using the Thermosphere‐Ionosphere‐Electrodynamics GCM (TIE‐GCM) and compare them to the observed neutral wind vectors from the Scanning Doppler Imagers located in central Alaska during the St. Patrick’s Day storm in 2013. To assess the model‐data discrepancies, the standard root‐mean‐square error is calculated, as well as the cross‐correlation coefficient to better capture the structural differences between the simulated and observed winds. Additionally, individual thermospheric forces are analyzed, providing a full diagnosis of the relative importance of each force on the neutral wind behavior. It was found that the realistic high‐latitude input resulted in better simulations of neutral wind structures than the empirical model did, although there was a slightly higher magnitude error. Altering the auroral energy flux mostly affected the resulting neutral wind speeds while the wind structures remained about the same. In the zonal direction, ion‐drag is the dominant force, with significant contributions from the horizontal advection force and secondary contributions from the Coriolis and pressure‐gradient forces. In the meridional direction, pressure‐gradient is the dominant force, with secondary contributions from the ion‐drag force and minor contributions from the Coriolis, horizontal advection and viscosity forces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja033366
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of High‐Latitude Input on Neutral Wind Structure and Forcing During the 17 March 2013 Storm

Katherine Davidson, M. Conde, G. Lu
4 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
4.62
article

Effects of High‐Latitude Input on Neutral Wind Structure and Forcing During the 17 March 2013 Storm

Katherine Davidson, M. Conde, G. Lu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this study, a quantitative assessment of the thermospheric wind forcing and its dependence on high‐latitude drivers is provided. Due to its coupling with the ionosphere via ion‐neutral collisions, the simulated neutral wind and the corresponding thermospheric forcing from Global Circulation Models (GCMs) are highly dependent on the model’s high‐latitude ionospheric input. To study the effects of the different ionospheric inputs, we simulate the thermospheric winds using the Thermosphere‐Ionosphere‐Electrodynamics GCM (TIE‐GCM) and compare them to the observed neutral wind vectors from the Scanning Doppler Imagers located in central Alaska during the St. Patrick’s Day storm in 2013. To assess the model‐data discrepancies, the standard root‐mean‐square error is calculated, as well as the cross‐correlation coefficient to better capture the structural differences between the simulated and observed winds. Additionally, individual thermospheric forces are analyzed, providing a full diagnosis of the relative importance of each force on the neutral wind behavior. It was found that the realistic high‐latitude input resulted in better simulations of neutral wind structures than the empirical model did, although there was a slightly higher magnitude error. Altering the auroral energy flux mostly affected the resulting neutral wind speeds while the wind structures remained about the same. In the zonal direction, ion‐drag is the dominant force, with significant contributions from the horizontal advection force and secondary contributions from the Coriolis and pressure‐gradient forces. In the meridional direction, pressure‐gradient is the dominant force, with secondary contributions from the ion‐drag force and minor contributions from the Coriolis, horizontal advection and viscosity forces.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 130(3)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), NSF NCAR High Altitude Observatory (US), University of Alaska Fairbanks (US), University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
4.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.