“The One Who Left Does Not Come Back”: The Context of the Publication of the Short Story ʽTakyr’ in Almanac Aiding-Giunler

The article attempts to contextualize the short story “Takyr” by Andrei Platonov. The details of its publication history allow us to evaluate links and contacts that place the story into the literary situation of Turkmen writers’ brigade. The story is put into three perspectives: its place in the almanac, its reflection in the local press, and critical reception. The latter tells that at some point “Takyr” provoked a reaction similar to one provoked by Turkmen text from the next almanac (Turkmenia, 1936). The article also presents a newly found folklore citation. The usage of archival sources, such as Grigory Sannikov’s collection in the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art (F. 3256), allows us to establish connections necessary to further annotation. The summarized contextualization leads to a conclusion that “Takyr,” being significantly different from the other texts in the almanac, can still be put in a larger perspective of complex links. The article mildly corrects Katharine Holt’s hypothesis of “collective authorship” on Platonov’s prose.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Litterarum
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2025-10-1-134-153
Primary Topic
Digital Storytelling and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The One Who Left Does Not Come Back”: The Context of the Publication of the Short Story ʽTakyr’ in Almanac Aiding-Giunler

Alla O. Burtseva
1 links
Studia Litterarum
Digital Storytelling and Education
article

“The One Who Left Does Not Come Back”: The Context of the Publication of the Short Story ʽTakyr’ in Almanac Aiding-Giunler

Alla O. Burtseva
article en

Abstract

The article attempts to contextualize the short story “Takyr” by Andrei Platonov. The details of its publication history allow us to evaluate links and contacts that place the story into the literary situation of Turkmen writers’ brigade. The story is put into three perspectives: its place in the almanac, its reflection in the local press, and critical reception. The latter tells that at some point “Takyr” provoked a reaction similar to one provoked by Turkmen text from the next almanac (Turkmenia, 1936). The article also presents a newly found folklore citation. The usage of archival sources, such as Grigory Sannikov’s collection in the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art (F. 3256), allows us to establish connections necessary to further annotation. The summarized contextualization leads to a conclusion that “Takyr,” being significantly different from the other texts in the almanac, can still be put in a larger perspective of complex links. The article mildly corrects Katharine Holt’s hypothesis of “collective authorship” on Platonov’s prose.

Studia LitterarumVol. 10
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Digital Storytelling and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“The One Who Left Does Not Come Back”: The Context of the Publication of the Short Story ʽTakyr’ in Almanac Aiding-Giunler — Alla O. Burtseva · Studia Litterarum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS