Research on establishment decision of medical equipment measurement standard based on GDM-AHP

The problems in the current medical equipment measurement work have made many medical institutions begin to consider establishing a convenient, long-term stable and low-cost measurement service model by establishing internal measurement standards, but they have not made further in-depth exploration and the construction of a perfect measurement standard to establish a feasibility evaluation system. This study aims to construct a feasibility evaluation system for establishing measurement standards based on the Group Decision Making-Analytical Hierarchy Processes and provide a reference basis for decision-making in the establishment of measurement standards for medical equipment. A feasibility evaluation system for the establishment of measurement standards based on Group Decision Making-Analytical Hierarchy Processes is constructed, which includes 5 main criteria-level evaluation indicators and 14 sub-criteria-level evaluation indicators. The relative weights of the criteria-level evaluation indicators are calculated by constructing a judgment matrix through pairwise comparisons of the evaluation indicators using the Saaty scale method. Additionally, sensitivity analysis of the constructed model is conducted using the perturbation method. Then, we applied the constructed evaluation system to the feasibility evaluation of establishing measurement standards for eight different types of medical equipment in seven medical institutions. Differences in medical institutions and categories of medical equipment both have an impact on the values of the feasibility indicators for the establishment of measurement standards for medical equipment. The results of this study show that, the feasibility evaluation system for establishing measurement standards based on Group Decision Making-Analytical Hierarchy Processes can transform the problem of exploring the feasibility of establishing measurement standards in medical institutions into a multi-indicator quantitative evaluation problem, making the difficult-to-quantify decision-making process more scientific and objective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94546-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on establishment decision of medical equipment measurement standard based on GDM-AHP

Shih-Fen Cheng, Falu Weng, Zhenyu Pan, Yang Liu et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
7.06
article

Research on establishment decision of medical equipment measurement standard based on GDM-AHP

Shih-Fen Cheng, Falu Weng, Zhenyu Pan, Yang Liu, Jing Tian, Xiaohong Fang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The problems in the current medical equipment measurement work have made many medical institutions begin to consider establishing a convenient, long-term stable and low-cost measurement service model by establishing internal measurement standards, but they have not made further in-depth exploration and the construction of a perfect measurement standard to establish a feasibility evaluation system. This study aims to construct a feasibility evaluation system for establishing measurement standards based on the Group Decision Making-Analytical Hierarchy Processes and provide a reference basis for decision-making in the establishment of measurement standards for medical equipment. A feasibility evaluation system for the establishment of measurement standards based on Group Decision Making-Analytical Hierarchy Processes is constructed, which includes 5 main criteria-level evaluation indicators and 14 sub-criteria-level evaluation indicators. The relative weights of the criteria-level evaluation indicators are calculated by constructing a judgment matrix through pairwise comparisons of the evaluation indicators using the Saaty scale method. Additionally, sensitivity analysis of the constructed model is conducted using the perturbation method. Then, we applied the constructed evaluation system to the feasibility evaluation of establishing measurement standards for eight different types of medical equipment in seven medical institutions. Differences in medical institutions and categories of medical equipment both have an impact on the values of the feasibility indicators for the establishment of measurement standards for medical equipment. The results of this study show that, the feasibility evaluation system for establishing measurement standards based on Group Decision Making-Analytical Hierarchy Processes can transform the problem of exploring the feasibility of establishing measurement standards in medical institutions into a multi-indicator quantitative evaluation problem, making the difficult-to-quantify decision-making process more scientific and objective.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Wuhan University (CN), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (CN), Pfizer (China) (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
7.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.