Archaic Poetry, Epigraphical Letters and Early Greek Literary Prose

Abstract Ancient Greece developed prose as a medium for intellectual expression only after centuries of reliance on poetry for authoritative public speech. The impact of this centuries-long predominance of poetry on early literary prose is traceable both in a deliberate engagement with traditional poetry, and in the adoption of comparable enunciative strategies. After reviewing select examples from the extant corpus of archaic poetry, this paper draws a comparison between select inscriptional and non-inscriptional prose evidence. It then brings poetic and prose sources together to highlight shared indexical strategies, in particular the use of the first person singular, often introduced after a switch from the third person singular. The analysis of such shared pragmatic features can help shed light on the processes that led to the entextualization of early literary prose, and uncover the ongoing negotiation between the oral and textual dimensions that characterized the newly developing prose genres.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mnemosyne
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-bja10310
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Archaic Poetry, Epigraphical Letters and Early Greek Literary Prose

Giulia Donelli
Mnemosyne
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Archaic Poetry, Epigraphical Letters and Early Greek Literary Prose

Giulia Donelli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ancient Greece developed prose as a medium for intellectual expression only after centuries of reliance on poetry for authoritative public speech. The impact of this centuries-long predominance of poetry on early literary prose is traceable both in a deliberate engagement with traditional poetry, and in the adoption of comparable enunciative strategies. After reviewing select examples from the extant corpus of archaic poetry, this paper draws a comparison between select inscriptional and non-inscriptional prose evidence. It then brings poetic and prose sources together to highlight shared indexical strategies, in particular the use of the first person singular, often introduced after a switch from the third person singular. The analysis of such shared pragmatic features can help shed light on the processes that led to the entextualization of early literary prose, and uncover the ongoing negotiation between the oral and textual dimensions that characterized the newly developing prose genres.

MnemosyneVol. 78(2)
University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.