The Four Causes Revisited: A Scholastic Framework for Analyzing Human Affairs

Abstract The causal explanation of human action has received increasing attention in social studies since the latter half of the twentieth century. A key question in this context is whether Aristotle’s framework of the four causes originally applied to natural phenomena, can also be extended to human actions. Concerning a compatible perspective between free will and causality, we contend that the Scholastic contributions offer a significant advancement in addressing this question. They demonstrate that the four causes, as interpreted by Scholastic thinkers, provide a robust explanatory tool for analyzing human affairs and their dynamics. Moreover, we argue that their contributions go beyond theoretical analysis, offering a comprehensive framework for understanding how causal principles can be applied to various aspects of human experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Affairs
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2024-0118
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Four Causes Revisited: A Scholastic Framework for Analyzing Human Affairs

رضا اکبری, Mohammadhosein Bahmanpour‐Khalesi, Mohammadjavad Sharifzadeh
Human Affairs
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

The Four Causes Revisited: A Scholastic Framework for Analyzing Human Affairs

رضا اکبری, Mohammadhosein Bahmanpour‐Khalesi, Mohammadjavad Sharifzadeh
article en

Abstract

Abstract The causal explanation of human action has received increasing attention in social studies since the latter half of the twentieth century. A key question in this context is whether Aristotle’s framework of the four causes originally applied to natural phenomena, can also be extended to human actions. Concerning a compatible perspective between free will and causality, we contend that the Scholastic contributions offer a significant advancement in addressing this question. They demonstrate that the four causes, as interpreted by Scholastic thinkers, provide a robust explanatory tool for analyzing human affairs and their dynamics. Moreover, we argue that their contributions go beyond theoretical analysis, offering a comprehensive framework for understanding how causal principles can be applied to various aspects of human experience.

Human AffairsVol. 35(3)
Imam Sadiq University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Four Causes Revisited: A Scholastic Framework for Analyzing Human Affairs — رضا اکبری, Mohammadhosein Bahmanpour‐Khalesi, et al. · Human Affairs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS