Media „społecznościowe” jako media masowe – perspektywa filozoficzna

The purpose of this article is to discuss the thesis that a completely new and better type of political activism is associated with new digital media practices. I pose the following problem: are we pinning too many hopes for the democratisation of our social life on the so-called new media (especially various types of “social” networks)? When I speak of “democratisation”, I have in mind two potentialities inherent in the new digital technologies: dialogicity and transparency. These two qualities were absent from the discursive (here: one-way) messages of the traditional media (press) and the electronic media (radio, television). And it is precisely in technical possibilities and the ideas associated with them that the sources of positions claiming qualitative differences between the effects of traditional mass communication and the new “social” communication lie. I conduct these reflections from a philosophical perspective, drawing on the twentieth-century tradition of media and political philosophy (e.g. Vilém Flusser, the first generation of the Frankfurt School, Peter Sloterdijk, Mark Lilla, Régis Debray).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Politologiczne
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33896/spolit.2025.75.6
Primary Topic
Education and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Media „społecznościowe” jako media masowe – perspektywa filozoficzna

Przemysław Wiatr
Studia Politologiczne
Education and Cultural Studies
article

Media „społecznościowe” jako media masowe – perspektywa filozoficzna

Przemysław Wiatr
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to discuss the thesis that a completely new and better type of political activism is associated with new digital media practices. I pose the following problem: are we pinning too many hopes for the democratisation of our social life on the so-called new media (especially various types of “social” networks)? When I speak of “democratisation”, I have in mind two potentialities inherent in the new digital technologies: dialogicity and transparency. These two qualities were absent from the discursive (here: one-way) messages of the traditional media (press) and the electronic media (radio, television). And it is precisely in technical possibilities and the ideas associated with them that the sources of positions claiming qualitative differences between the effects of traditional mass communication and the new “social” communication lie. I conduct these reflections from a philosophical perspective, drawing on the twentieth-century tradition of media and political philosophy (e.g. Vilém Flusser, the first generation of the Frankfurt School, Peter Sloterdijk, Mark Lilla, Régis Debray).

Studia Politologiczne(1/2025(75))
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Education and Cultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Media „społecznościowe” jako media masowe – perspektywa filozoficzna — Przemysław Wiatr · Studia Politologiczne (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS