Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Plus Eating Disorder Comorbidity: Are Two Diagnoses Better Than One?

Zickgraf and colleagues propose an elegant revised framework for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder that would recognize it as a diagnosis based on the presence of specific eating behaviors, and, importantly, allow for it to be diagnosed alongside other medical and psychiatric conditions, including other eating disorders. While likely to have good ecological validity, this radical proposal challenges the general conceptualization of ARFID as the eating disorder in which weight- and shape-concerns are not present. Here, we consider whether two diagnoses are indeed better than one, raising challenges we have observed in clinical and research practice. We offer an alternative hybrid categorical-dimensional framework for considering ARFID and co-occurring eating disorder symptoms and encourage a set of next steps for research in this nosological arena.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24417
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Plus Eating Disorder Comorbidity: Are Two Diagnoses Better Than One?

Sonakshi Negi, Kamryn T. Eddy
4 citations
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
9.23
article

Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Plus Eating Disorder Comorbidity: Are Two Diagnoses Better Than One?

Sonakshi Negi, Kamryn T. Eddy
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Zickgraf and colleagues propose an elegant revised framework for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder that would recognize it as a diagnosis based on the presence of specific eating behaviors, and, importantly, allow for it to be diagnosed alongside other medical and psychiatric conditions, including other eating disorders. While likely to have good ecological validity, this radical proposal challenges the general conceptualization of ARFID as the eating disorder in which weight- and shape-concerns are not present. Here, we consider whether two diagnoses are indeed better than one, raising challenges we have observed in clinical and research practice. We offer an alternative hybrid categorical-dimensional framework for considering ARFID and co-occurring eating disorder symptoms and encourage a set of next steps for research in this nosological arena.

International Journal of Eating DisordersVol. 58(6)
Harvard University (US), University of Kansas (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
9.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Plus Eating Disorder Comorbidity: Are Two Diagnoses Better Than One? — Sonakshi Negi, Kamryn T. Eddy · International Journal of Eating Disorders (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS