NIH’s 15% cap: a cost comparison and research outlook

The decision by the US government to cap the NIH grant overhead rate to 15% will likely underfund the country’s research institutions for their infrastructure relative to their international peers and the private sector. This move could jeopardize the country’s lead in the biological sciences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EMBO Reports
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44319-025-00418-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NIH’s 15% cap: a cost comparison and research outlook

Mikael Elias, Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin
2 citations
EMBO Reports
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
6.26
article

NIH’s 15% cap: a cost comparison and research outlook

Mikael Elias, Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The decision by the US government to cap the NIH grant overhead rate to 15% will likely underfund the country’s research institutions for their infrastructure relative to their international peers and the private sector. This move could jeopardize the country’s lead in the biological sciences.

EMBO ReportsVol. 26(7)
University of Minnesota (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Biotechnology Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.