Embodied Mentalization – The Case of Human Movement in the Rorschach

Abstract: Human movement responses (M) to the Rorschach Test have been retained in all coding systems and captivated clinicians and researchers for over a century. M seems to rest both in the card and in the subject and neither completely in the blot nor in the mind. Neurobiological and clinical studies as well as meta-analytic evidence show that M is not a one-dimensional code only but a complex, multidetermined class of neuropsychological mechanisms embedding constructs such as the mirror neuron system, embodied cognition, mentalization, and referential activity. The recent generative predictive model of perception offers a new angle for conceiving M as an affordance that is balanced between high precision of the sensory signal (perceptual processing of blot features) and stored knowledge or internal mental images of self and others (priors). Within this conceptual framework, this study suggests a novel perspective for M based on the four gradients of levels of embodied mentalization, M frequency, M complexity, and level of reality testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/a000189
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychological Testing and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embodied Mentalization – The Case of Human Movement in the Rorschach

Piero Porcelli
1 citations
Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach
Psychological Testing and Assessment
1.54
article

Embodied Mentalization – The Case of Human Movement in the Rorschach

Piero Porcelli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Human movement responses (M) to the Rorschach Test have been retained in all coding systems and captivated clinicians and researchers for over a century. M seems to rest both in the card and in the subject and neither completely in the blot nor in the mind. Neurobiological and clinical studies as well as meta-analytic evidence show that M is not a one-dimensional code only but a complex, multidetermined class of neuropsychological mechanisms embedding constructs such as the mirror neuron system, embodied cognition, mentalization, and referential activity. The recent generative predictive model of perception offers a new angle for conceiving M as an affordance that is balanced between high precision of the sensory signal (perceptual processing of blot features) and stored knowledge or internal mental images of self and others (priors). Within this conceptual framework, this study suggests a novel perspective for M based on the four gradients of levels of embodied mentalization, M frequency, M complexity, and level of reality testing.

Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the RorschachVol. 46(1)
University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Psychological Testing and Assessment
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.