On the Deliberative Process: An Analysis of the 13th State Conference on Social Assistance in Santa Catarina, Brazil

Research objective: To analyze how the practice of e-Participation, applied at the 13th Social Assistance Conference of the State of Santa Catarina, held in 2021, favored or hindered participation and to what extent it influenced the actors in decision-making. Theoretical framework: Conferences are spaces for social participation and deliberation to formulate plans for Social Assistance policy and have been held in Brazil since 1995, in person. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the format was changed to virtual. To support these perspectives, we explored the literature on citizen participation in conferences, e-participation during the Covid-19 pandemic, elements that influence the e-participation process and mediation. Methodology: We analyze the three phases of the conference process: preparation, execution and conclusion. The methodological design is mainly influenced by the work of Coelho, Cunha and Pozzebon (2022) who follow a process-based approach, and consider the actors, design, interaction, mechanisms of influence and mediation, together, lead to the results of the process of e-participation. We used multiple sources for this analysis: bibliographic and documentary research, questionnaire and observation. Results: The virtual format presents greater objectivity to the discussion of agendas, favors the inclusion of more individuals, and requires less investment to hold conferences. However, it requires greater skill from participants, especially in the use of technology, which makes participation difficult, especially for users of the Unified Social Assistance System. Originality: Studies on conferences have investigated distinct elements. However, there is a lack of studies on conferences in an online format, specifically in social assistance and during the pandemic period. Theoretical and practical contributions: The research contributes by noting that many of the difficulties presented in the virtual online format are also highlighted in studies on conferences in an in-person format.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Administração Pública e Gestão Social
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v17i1.18131
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Public Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Deliberative Process: An Analysis of the 13th State Conference on Social Assistance in Santa Catarina, Brazil

Cristiana Pereira, Bruna Hamerski, Sulivan Desirée Fischer, Leonardo Secchi
1 citations
Administração Pública e Gestão Social
Education and Public Policy
8.52
article

On the Deliberative Process: An Analysis of the 13th State Conference on Social Assistance in Santa Catarina, Brazil

Cristiana Pereira, Bruna Hamerski, Sulivan Desirée Fischer, Leonardo Secchi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research objective: To analyze how the practice of e-Participation, applied at the 13th Social Assistance Conference of the State of Santa Catarina, held in 2021, favored or hindered participation and to what extent it influenced the actors in decision-making. Theoretical framework: Conferences are spaces for social participation and deliberation to formulate plans for Social Assistance policy and have been held in Brazil since 1995, in person. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the format was changed to virtual. To support these perspectives, we explored the literature on citizen participation in conferences, e-participation during the Covid-19 pandemic, elements that influence the e-participation process and mediation. Methodology: We analyze the three phases of the conference process: preparation, execution and conclusion. The methodological design is mainly influenced by the work of Coelho, Cunha and Pozzebon (2022) who follow a process-based approach, and consider the actors, design, interaction, mechanisms of influence and mediation, together, lead to the results of the process of e-participation. We used multiple sources for this analysis: bibliographic and documentary research, questionnaire and observation. Results: The virtual format presents greater objectivity to the discussion of agendas, favors the inclusion of more individuals, and requires less investment to hold conferences. However, it requires greater skill from participants, especially in the use of technology, which makes participation difficult, especially for users of the Unified Social Assistance System. Originality: Studies on conferences have investigated distinct elements. However, there is a lack of studies on conferences in an online format, specifically in social assistance and during the pandemic period. Theoretical and practical contributions: The research contributes by noting that many of the difficulties presented in the virtual online format are also highlighted in studies on conferences in an in-person format.

Administração Pública e Gestão Social
Twitter (United States) (US), Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Education and Public Policy
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.