Authorial voice in addressing the readership

Abstract This paper examines authorial presence in late-Modern English scientific writing through a study of second-person pronouns in the chet (History texts) and cec he t (Chemistry texts) sub-corpora of the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. Although existing studies in this area have tended to focus on self-mentions ( Hyland 2001 , 2008 ; Flowerdew and Ho Wang 2015 ; Moskowich 2020 ; Suau-Jiménez 2020 ), I will argue that second-person pronominal forms can also reflect and underline more broadly the author’s voice through direct interaction with the readership ( Ivanić and Camps 2001 ; Matsuda and Tardy 2007 ), especially in terms of dialogic you . This interaction is seen in the use of you forms and the possible functions that these perform, according to period, discipline, socio-external factors, and the sex of the author. Whereas observing the data from these diverse perspectives can yield differing, partial results, it can be argued that, when taken together, such elements can lead to a far more accurate picture of an author’s voice. The analysis presented here is an attempt to confirm that this is indeed the case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.23019.cre
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
30.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authorial voice in addressing the readership

Begoña Crespo
2 citations
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
30.35
article

Authorial voice in addressing the readership

Begoña Crespo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines authorial presence in late-Modern English scientific writing through a study of second-person pronouns in the chet (History texts) and cec he t (Chemistry texts) sub-corpora of the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. Although existing studies in this area have tended to focus on self-mentions ( Hyland 2001 , 2008 ; Flowerdew and Ho Wang 2015 ; Moskowich 2020 ; Suau-Jiménez 2020 ), I will argue that second-person pronominal forms can also reflect and underline more broadly the author’s voice through direct interaction with the readership ( Ivanić and Camps 2001 ; Matsuda and Tardy 2007 ), especially in terms of dialogic you . This interaction is seen in the use of you forms and the possible functions that these perform, according to period, discipline, socio-external factors, and the sex of the author. Whereas observing the data from these diverse perspectives can yield differing, partial results, it can be argued that, when taken together, such elements can lead to a far more accurate picture of an author’s voice. The analysis presented here is an attempt to confirm that this is indeed the case.

Journal of Historical PragmaticsVol. 26(2)
Universidade da Coruña (ES), ELTE Research Centre for Linguistics (HU)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
30.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.