A sampling method for differentiating breath and ruminal exhaled volatile organic compounds in dairy cows using methane as a marker

Frequent eructation in ruminant animals results in an exhaled blend of ruminal eructed and breath volatile organic compounds (VOC). The physiological distinction between the gas sources can limit the applicability of breath metabolomics (or breathomics) in describing the metabolic phenotype of cows. The objective of this study was to establish a benchmark sampling method for collecting breath samples in dairy cows while they were not eructating. Twelve multiparous mid-lactation Holstein cows were enrolled to collect (1) breath (BR; bloodborne VOC exchanged at the lungs) and (2) ruminal exhaled (RE; a mixture of VOC from ruminal eructation and breaths during eructations) samples. Gas samples were collected using a head chamber (GreenFeed system) with real-time CH<sub>4</sub> readings. By monitoring eructation events, a threshold of <150 mV CH<sub>4</sub> was set to sample breath, and >250 mV was used to collect BR and RE. Both samples were analyzed using secondary electrospray ionization-high resolution MS (SESI-MS) and GC. Implementing CH<sub>4</sub> as a marker resulted in 80% lower CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations in BR compared with RE. Analysis using SESI-MS revealed a total of 324 and 242 features consistently identified across all periods of the study in [M-H]<sup>-</sup> and [M+H]<sup>+</sup> MS ion mode, respectively, for BR and RE. In BR, 18 features exhibited greater concentrations, whereas 8 had a tendency to have greater concentrations compared with RE. In contrast, RE revealed 51 features with greater concentrations, and 13 with a tendency for greater concentrations compared with BR. Ruminal VFA acetate, propionate, and butyrate were 20.9%, 27.4%, and 32.7% greater in RE compared with BR, respectively. Lower CH<sub>4</sub> levels in BR and the greater VFA concentrations in the RE validated the ability of the method to differentiate breath from ruminal eructed VOC. Our study established a method to distinguish and separately collect BR and RE samples in dairy cows. This advance shows the potential to use breathomics as a reliable and noninvasive tool for metabolic assessments in ruminant research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JDS Communications
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2024-0732
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A sampling method for differentiating breath and ruminal exhaled volatile organic compounds in dairy cows using methane as a marker

Renato Zenobi, U. Arshad, Rong Peng, Stamatios Giannoukos et al.
5 citations
JDS Communications
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
3.37
article

A sampling method for differentiating breath and ruminal exhaled volatile organic compounds in dairy cows using methane as a marker

Renato Zenobi, U. Arshad, Rong Peng, Stamatios Giannoukos, S.E. Räisänen, Mutian Niu, Carmen Kunz, M A Barrientos-Blanco, Z. Islam
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Frequent eructation in ruminant animals results in an exhaled blend of ruminal eructed and breath volatile organic compounds (VOC). The physiological distinction between the gas sources can limit the applicability of breath metabolomics (or breathomics) in describing the metabolic phenotype of cows. The objective of this study was to establish a benchmark sampling method for collecting breath samples in dairy cows while they were not eructating. Twelve multiparous mid-lactation Holstein cows were enrolled to collect (1) breath (BR; bloodborne VOC exchanged at the lungs) and (2) ruminal exhaled (RE; a mixture of VOC from ruminal eructation and breaths during eructations) samples. Gas samples were collected using a head chamber (GreenFeed system) with real-time CH<sub>4</sub> readings. By monitoring eructation events, a threshold of <150 mV CH<sub>4</sub> was set to sample breath, and >250 mV was used to collect BR and RE. Both samples were analyzed using secondary electrospray ionization-high resolution MS (SESI-MS) and GC. Implementing CH<sub>4</sub> as a marker resulted in 80% lower CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations in BR compared with RE. Analysis using SESI-MS revealed a total of 324 and 242 features consistently identified across all periods of the study in [M-H]<sup>-</sup> and [M+H]<sup>+</sup> MS ion mode, respectively, for BR and RE. In BR, 18 features exhibited greater concentrations, whereas 8 had a tendency to have greater concentrations compared with RE. In contrast, RE revealed 51 features with greater concentrations, and 13 with a tendency for greater concentrations compared with BR. Ruminal VFA acetate, propionate, and butyrate were 20.9%, 27.4%, and 32.7% greater in RE compared with BR, respectively. Lower CH<sub>4</sub> levels in BR and the greater VFA concentrations in the RE validated the ability of the method to differentiate breath from ruminal eructed VOC. Our study established a method to distinguish and separately collect BR and RE samples in dairy cows. This advance shows the potential to use breathomics as a reliable and noninvasive tool for metabolic assessments in ruminant research.

JDS CommunicationsVol. 6(3)
ETH Zurich (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
3.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.