Tree species identity modifies the efficiency of habitat tree retention for conserving epiphytes in temperate mountain forests

Forest ecosystems play an outstanding role in supporting diverse bryophyte and lichen communities. However, intensive forest management has led to a considerable decline of epiphyte communities, which are sensitive to the simplification of forest stands and the interruption of stand continuity. Retention forestry, which originally aimed to conserve important structural elements for biodiversity after clearcut, has more recently also been incorporated into continuous-cover forestry in temperate European forests. As both management systems differ from each other, it is difficult to transfer findings to the efficiency of retention measures for biodiversity conservation from clearcut to continuous-cover management systems. Therefore, we studied how habitat trees retained in continuous-cover forestry in temperate mountain forests of Germany dominated by Fagus sylvatica , Picea abies , and Abies alba would benefit epiphytic bryophytes and lichens. We analysed the epiphyte vegetation on 1254 trees in 132 forest stands. We compared large-sized habitat retention trees (HT) and smaller-sized average trees (AT). We detected a significantly higher species richness on HT, which was more strongly driven by lichens than by bryophytes. Even stronger increases in Simpson and Shannon diversity suggested that these increases in richness were due to increased population sizes of several species and not due to the addition of few individuals of few species. Strong variability in the response of epiphyte diversity occurred between tree species, with bryophytes being particularly favored by F. sylvatica and lichens by A. alba . Retention of HT is thus a suitable tool to conserve epiphytes in Central European temperate forests, even after blind selection of HT without consideration of the epiphyte vegetation before tree selection. • The potential of habitat tree retention for conserving epiphytes was investigated. • We studied bryophytes and lichens on 1254 trees and 132 plots. • Large-diameter habitat trees had higher species richness than average-size trees. • Bryophytes were most favored by beech and lichens by silver fir. • Habitat trees are an efficient tool for epiphyte conservation in managed forests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122616
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Lichen and fungal ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tree species identity modifies the efficiency of habitat tree retention for conserving epiphytes in temperate mountain forests

Dina Emrich, Lena Gustafsson, Markus Hauck, Stefan Kaufmann
5 citations
Forest Ecology and Management
Lichen and fungal ecology
15.13
article

Tree species identity modifies the efficiency of habitat tree retention for conserving epiphytes in temperate mountain forests

Dina Emrich, Lena Gustafsson, Markus Hauck, Stefan Kaufmann
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Forest ecosystems play an outstanding role in supporting diverse bryophyte and lichen communities. However, intensive forest management has led to a considerable decline of epiphyte communities, which are sensitive to the simplification of forest stands and the interruption of stand continuity. Retention forestry, which originally aimed to conserve important structural elements for biodiversity after clearcut, has more recently also been incorporated into continuous-cover forestry in temperate European forests. As both management systems differ from each other, it is difficult to transfer findings to the efficiency of retention measures for biodiversity conservation from clearcut to continuous-cover management systems. Therefore, we studied how habitat trees retained in continuous-cover forestry in temperate mountain forests of Germany dominated by Fagus sylvatica , Picea abies , and Abies alba would benefit epiphytic bryophytes and lichens. We analysed the epiphyte vegetation on 1254 trees in 132 forest stands. We compared large-sized habitat retention trees (HT) and smaller-sized average trees (AT). We detected a significantly higher species richness on HT, which was more strongly driven by lichens than by bryophytes. Even stronger increases in Simpson and Shannon diversity suggested that these increases in richness were due to increased population sizes of several species and not due to the addition of few individuals of few species. Strong variability in the response of epiphyte diversity occurred between tree species, with bryophytes being particularly favored by F. sylvatica and lichens by A. alba . Retention of HT is thus a suitable tool to conserve epiphytes in Central European temperate forests, even after blind selection of HT without consideration of the epiphyte vegetation before tree selection. • The potential of habitat tree retention for conserving epiphytes was investigated. • We studied bryophytes and lichens on 1254 trees and 132 plots. • Large-diameter habitat trees had higher species richness than average-size trees. • Bryophytes were most favored by beech and lichens by silver fir. • Habitat trees are an efficient tool for epiphyte conservation in managed forests.

Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 585
University of Freiburg (DE), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Lichen and fungal ecology
15.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.