Bearing Prognostics Using the PRONOSTIA Data: A Comparative Study

Vibration-based condition monitoring is a well-developed and established field in maintenance engineering. Failure prognosis is a crucial aspect of condition monitoring, particularly Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction. Over the last decade, the PRONOSTIA bearing dataset has become the standard reference for testing these prognostic algorithms. However, the lack of standardized comparisons makes it difficult to objectively assess the relative performance of different methods. This paper systematically compares three established data-driven artificial intelligence approaches: classical machine learning, deep learning, and transfer learning approaches. We analyze their application to the PRONOSTIA dataset, providing detailed discussions of their relative strengths, limitations, and achieved performance. While this study primarily serves as a benchmark for testing new prognostic algorithms in vibration monitoring, we hope the insights will also broadly apply to other condition-monitoring techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3551772
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bearing Prognostics Using the PRONOSTIA Data: A Comparative Study

Alexander Selvikvåg Lundervold, Thorstein R. Rykkje, Hariom Dhungana
5 citations
IEEE Access
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
6.07
article

Bearing Prognostics Using the PRONOSTIA Data: A Comparative Study

Alexander Selvikvåg Lundervold, Thorstein R. Rykkje, Hariom Dhungana
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Vibration-based condition monitoring is a well-developed and established field in maintenance engineering. Failure prognosis is a crucial aspect of condition monitoring, particularly Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction. Over the last decade, the PRONOSTIA bearing dataset has become the standard reference for testing these prognostic algorithms. However, the lack of standardized comparisons makes it difficult to objectively assess the relative performance of different methods. This paper systematically compares three established data-driven artificial intelligence approaches: classical machine learning, deep learning, and transfer learning approaches. We analyze their application to the PRONOSTIA dataset, providing detailed discussions of their relative strengths, limitations, and achieved performance. While this study primarily serves as a benchmark for testing new prognostic algorithms in vibration monitoring, we hope the insights will also broadly apply to other condition-monitoring techniques.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
6.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bearing Prognostics Using the PRONOSTIA Data: A Comparative Study — Alexander Selvikvåg Lundervold, Thorstein R. Rykkje, et al. · IEEE Access (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS