Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a self-adhesive vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities: Results after five years

The novel self-adhesive dual-curing bulk-fill restorative material exhibited clinically acceptable outcomes over 60 months, similarly to a conventional bulk-fill restorative used with a universal adhesive, with only minor cutbacks in esthetic properties. Thus, both materials can be considered suitable for clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dentistry
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105663
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a self-adhesive vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities: Results after five years

Wolfgang Buchalla, Konstantin J. Scholz, Marianne Federlin, Fabian Cieplik et al.
7 citations
Journal of Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
11.73
article

Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a self-adhesive vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities: Results after five years

Wolfgang Buchalla, Konstantin J. Scholz, Marianne Federlin, Fabian Cieplik, Sarah Ettenberger, Julia L Pfister, Isabelle M Schenke, Karl‐Anton Hiller
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The novel self-adhesive dual-curing bulk-fill restorative material exhibited clinically acceptable outcomes over 60 months, similarly to a conventional bulk-fill restorative used with a universal adhesive, with only minor cutbacks in esthetic properties. Thus, both materials can be considered suitable for clinical application.

Journal of DentistryVol. 156
University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), University Hospital Regensburg (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Dental materials and restorations
11.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.