MORAL DECISION-MAKING FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING BASED ON MULTI-OBJECTIVE REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

Vehicles must ensure safety and efficiency and deal with complex ethical dilemmas in autonomous driving. In order to deal with these ethical dilemmas effectively, moral decision-making models based on multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) provide a technical path to resolve such ethical dilemmas. Unlike traditional reinforcement learning (RL), MORL can generate more socially moral decision-making strategies in conflict scenarios by simultaneously optimizing multiple objectives. Of course, significant challenges remain in this research path. Assigning reward function weights is highly dependent on subjective judgement and cultural context; the dynamic environment is not adaptable enough, and the scarcity of ethical dilemma data limits model training. To address these issues, this paper points out that future research needs to focus on the dynamic weight adjustment mechanism, the construction of cross-cultural ethical frameworks, and large-scale real-world validation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation and technology studies.
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61784/its3009
Primary Topic
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MORAL DECISION-MAKING FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING BASED ON MULTI-OBJECTIVE REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

Innovation and technology studies.
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
article

MORAL DECISION-MAKING FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING BASED ON MULTI-OBJECTIVE REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

article en

Abstract

Vehicles must ensure safety and efficiency and deal with complex ethical dilemmas in autonomous driving. In order to deal with these ethical dilemmas effectively, moral decision-making models based on multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) provide a technical path to resolve such ethical dilemmas. Unlike traditional reinforcement learning (RL), MORL can generate more socially moral decision-making strategies in conflict scenarios by simultaneously optimizing multiple objectives. Of course, significant challenges remain in this research path. Assigning reward function weights is highly dependent on subjective judgement and cultural context; the dynamic environment is not adaptable enough, and the scarcity of ethical dilemma data limits model training. To address these issues, this paper points out that future research needs to focus on the dynamic weight adjustment mechanism, the construction of cross-cultural ethical frameworks, and large-scale real-world validation.

Innovation and technology studies.Vol. 2(1)
Shenzhen University (CN), Shenzhen Technology University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.