AI LITERACY, SELF-EFFICACY, AND SELF-COMPETENCE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS: VARIANCES AND INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG VARIABLES

Understanding and securely using AI systems and tools requires AI literacy. In contrast, AI self-efficacy is a person's confidence in completing an AI task. Also, AI self-competence is the ability to explain how AI technologies are used at work and how they affect society. This study examines college students' AI literacy, self-efficacy, and self-competence. Using a descriptive-correlational approach, the proponent assessed respondents' AI literacy, self-efficacy, and self-competence. The study also examined variations and connections between factors. The study participants were 1000 college students selected by purposive sampling. Before data collection, the proponent employed a modified instrument that was validated. Data was descriptively and inferentially analyzed using SPSS 23. Results suggest most pupils were "somewhat literate" in AI. They regarded themselves as "somewhat self-efficient" but "self-competent" in AI. The inferential analysis showed substantial differences in AI literacy by college, year level, and birth sex. Self-efficacy varied by college, year, age, and birth sex. The study found college and year-level differences in self-competence. Demographic traits and study variables were associated to some extent. According to the study's findings, the proponent recommended AI training programs, skill development for students and teachers, and institution-wide policy development and implementation to maximize AI's use in learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Malaysian online journal of educational sciences
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22452/mojes.vol12no3.4
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI LITERACY, SELF-EFFICACY, AND SELF-COMPETENCE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS: VARIANCES AND INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG VARIABLES

John Mark R. Asio
3 citations
Malaysian online journal of educational sciences
Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
1.93
article

AI LITERACY, SELF-EFFICACY, AND SELF-COMPETENCE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS: VARIANCES AND INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG VARIABLES

John Mark R. Asio
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Understanding and securely using AI systems and tools requires AI literacy. In contrast, AI self-efficacy is a person's confidence in completing an AI task. Also, AI self-competence is the ability to explain how AI technologies are used at work and how they affect society. This study examines college students' AI literacy, self-efficacy, and self-competence. Using a descriptive-correlational approach, the proponent assessed respondents' AI literacy, self-efficacy, and self-competence. The study also examined variations and connections between factors. The study participants were 1000 college students selected by purposive sampling. Before data collection, the proponent employed a modified instrument that was validated. Data was descriptively and inferentially analyzed using SPSS 23. Results suggest most pupils were "somewhat literate" in AI. They regarded themselves as "somewhat self-efficient" but "self-competent" in AI. The inferential analysis showed substantial differences in AI literacy by college, year level, and birth sex. Self-efficacy varied by college, year, age, and birth sex. The study found college and year-level differences in self-competence. Demographic traits and study variables were associated to some extent. According to the study's findings, the proponent recommended AI training programs, skill development for students and teachers, and institution-wide policy development and implementation to maximize AI's use in learning.

Malaysian online journal of educational sciencesVol. 12(3)
Gordon State College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
1.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.