Underserved older adults’ treatment preferences for a mind-body activity program for chronic pain delivered via shared medical visits in a community clinic

Older adults with chronic pain from underserved communities need evidence-based pain management programs. To meet this need, we interviewed patients and staff from an underserved community clinic to identify their treatment preferences and barriers and facilitators to participating in a mind-body activity program. We conducted nine qualitative interviews (two staff; seven patients) and six focus groups (three staff groups; three patient groups), transcribed them verbatim and then used inductive-deductive thematic analysis guided by two pre-specified superordinate domains: (1) treatment preferences and (2) barriers and facilitators to participation. Participants recommended flexible, group participation options (in person, remote) with a credible leader and with multi-cultural considerations. They generally reacted positively to the proposed content. Barriers included logistical barriers (e.g. transportation, finances), weather, and skepticism about novel treatments; facilitators centered on expanding access and increasing sense of community. Our findings highlight important considerations to facilitate the uptake of mind-body activity programs for underserved older adults with chronic pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Health & Medicine
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2478517
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Underserved older adults’ treatment preferences for a mind-body activity program for chronic pain delivered via shared medical visits in a community clinic

Jonathan Greenberg, Alex Presciutti, Ana‐Maria Vranceanu, Julie Brewer et al.
1 citations
Psychology Health & Medicine
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
article

Underserved older adults’ treatment preferences for a mind-body activity program for chronic pain delivered via shared medical visits in a community clinic

Jonathan Greenberg, Alex Presciutti, Ana‐Maria Vranceanu, Julie Brewer, Christine S. Ritchie, Madison Ehmann, K. Mcdermott, Christina L. Rush, Nadine Levey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Older adults with chronic pain from underserved communities need evidence-based pain management programs. To meet this need, we interviewed patients and staff from an underserved community clinic to identify their treatment preferences and barriers and facilitators to participating in a mind-body activity program. We conducted nine qualitative interviews (two staff; seven patients) and six focus groups (three staff groups; three patient groups), transcribed them verbatim and then used inductive-deductive thematic analysis guided by two pre-specified superordinate domains: (1) treatment preferences and (2) barriers and facilitators to participation. Participants recommended flexible, group participation options (in person, remote) with a credible leader and with multi-cultural considerations. They generally reacted positively to the proposed content. Barriers included logistical barriers (e.g. transportation, finances), weather, and skepticism about novel treatments; facilitators centered on expanding access and increasing sense of community. Our findings highlight important considerations to facilitate the uptake of mind-body activity programs for underserved older adults with chronic pain.

Psychology Health & MedicineVol. 31(1)
Boston University (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Boston Children's Museum (US)
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Institute of Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.