Validity and Reliability of a Smartphone Application Versus 2D Software for Joint Range of Motion Measurement: A Cross-Sectional Validation Study

The assessment of joint ranges is an essential component of the physical examination, enabling monitoring and follow-up. Additionally, it is a key component of muscle mobility assessment. Smartphone applications for range-of-motion assessments offer a cost-effective alternative to traditional measurement tools, reducing the need for expensive equipment while maintaining accuracy. Their portability and ease of use provide significant advantages in clinical settings, allowing for quicker assessments. This, in turn, can enhance patient care by enabling more frequent monitoring and timely interventions, ultimately improving treatment outcomes. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the PhysioMaster application in measuring knee range of motion. Twenty-nine participants performed passive knee extensions, with data collected simultaneously through the application and video recordings for posterior angle calculations. The application demonstrated excellent validity, with intraclass correlation (ICC = between 0.729 and 0.814) and the Pearson correlation values ranging from r = 0.908 to 0.974. For inter-rater reliability, ICC was 0.898 and Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.82. Additionally, the coefficient of variation was 5.18%, and the measurement error was 0.82°. The results showed that the PhysioMaster application is a valid and reliable tool for assessing passive knee extension in clinical environments, supporting efficient and accurate patient evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Muscles
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/muscles4010008
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and Reliability of a Smartphone Application Versus 2D Software for Joint Range of Motion Measurement: A Cross-Sectional Validation Study

Inês Martins, Amândio Dias, Misha Gunot
2 citations
Muscles
Sports injuries and prevention
3.44
article

Validity and Reliability of a Smartphone Application Versus 2D Software for Joint Range of Motion Measurement: A Cross-Sectional Validation Study

Inês Martins, Amândio Dias, Misha Gunot
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The assessment of joint ranges is an essential component of the physical examination, enabling monitoring and follow-up. Additionally, it is a key component of muscle mobility assessment. Smartphone applications for range-of-motion assessments offer a cost-effective alternative to traditional measurement tools, reducing the need for expensive equipment while maintaining accuracy. Their portability and ease of use provide significant advantages in clinical settings, allowing for quicker assessments. This, in turn, can enhance patient care by enabling more frequent monitoring and timely interventions, ultimately improving treatment outcomes. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the PhysioMaster application in measuring knee range of motion. Twenty-nine participants performed passive knee extensions, with data collected simultaneously through the application and video recordings for posterior angle calculations. The application demonstrated excellent validity, with intraclass correlation (ICC = between 0.729 and 0.814) and the Pearson correlation values ranging from r = 0.908 to 0.974. For inter-rater reliability, ICC was 0.898 and Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.82. Additionally, the coefficient of variation was 5.18%, and the measurement error was 0.82°. The results showed that the PhysioMaster application is a valid and reliable tool for assessing passive knee extension in clinical environments, supporting efficient and accurate patient evaluations.

MusclesVol. 4(1)
Sprint (United States) (US), Escola Superior de Saúde Egas Moniz (PT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports injuries and prevention
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.