Can AI Technologies Support Clinical Supervision? Assessing the Potential of ChatGPT

Clinical supervision is essential for trainees, preventing burnout and ensuring the effectiveness of their interventions. AI technologies offer increasing possibilities for developing clinical practices, with supervision being particularly suited for automation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using ChatGPT-4 as a supervisory tool in psychotherapy training. To achieve this, a clinical case was presented to three distinct groups (untrained AI, pre-trained AI, and qualified human supervisor), and their feedback was evaluated by Gestalt psychotherapy trainees using a Likert scale rating of satisfaction. Statistical analysis, using the statistical package SPSS version 25 and applying principal component analysis (PCA) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), demonstrated significant differences in favor of pre-trained AI feedback. PCA highlighted four components of the questionnaire: relational and emotional (C1), didactic and technical quality (C2), treatment support and development (C3), and professional orientation and adaptability (C4). The ratings of satisfaction obtained from the three kinds of supervisory feedback were compared using ANOVA. The feedback generated by the pre-trained AI (f2) was rated significantly higher than the other two (untrained AI feedback (f1) and human feedback (f3)) in C4; in C1, the superiority of f2 over f1 but not over f3 appears significant. These results suggest that AI, when appropriately calibrated, may be an appreciable tool for complementing the effectiveness of clinical supervision, offering an innovative blended supervision methodology, in particular in the area of career guidance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Informatics
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12010029
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can AI Technologies Support Clinical Supervision? Assessing the Potential of ChatGPT

Enrico Moretto, Stefano Crispino, Ottavio Ragozzino, Mariano Pizzimenti et al.
8 citations
Informatics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
5.23
article

Can AI Technologies Support Clinical Supervision? Assessing the Potential of ChatGPT

Enrico Moretto, Stefano Crispino, Ottavio Ragozzino, Mariano Pizzimenti, Claudia Montanari, Alexander Lommatzsch, Antonio Ferrara, Giovanni Salonia, Valeria Cioffi, Elena Gigante, Raffaele Sperandeo, Lucia Luciana Mosca, Efisio Temporin, Claudio Billi, Valentina Barlacchi, Enrica Tortora, Annamaria Acocella
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Clinical supervision is essential for trainees, preventing burnout and ensuring the effectiveness of their interventions. AI technologies offer increasing possibilities for developing clinical practices, with supervision being particularly suited for automation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using ChatGPT-4 as a supervisory tool in psychotherapy training. To achieve this, a clinical case was presented to three distinct groups (untrained AI, pre-trained AI, and qualified human supervisor), and their feedback was evaluated by Gestalt psychotherapy trainees using a Likert scale rating of satisfaction. Statistical analysis, using the statistical package SPSS version 25 and applying principal component analysis (PCA) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), demonstrated significant differences in favor of pre-trained AI feedback. PCA highlighted four components of the questionnaire: relational and emotional (C1), didactic and technical quality (C2), treatment support and development (C3), and professional orientation and adaptability (C4). The ratings of satisfaction obtained from the three kinds of supervisory feedback were compared using ANOVA. The feedback generated by the pre-trained AI (f2) was rated significantly higher than the other two (untrained AI feedback (f1) and human feedback (f3)) in C4; in C1, the superiority of f2 over f1 but not over f3 appears significant. These results suggest that AI, when appropriately calibrated, may be an appreciable tool for complementing the effectiveness of clinical supervision, offering an innovative blended supervision methodology, in particular in the area of career guidance.

InformaticsVol. 12(1)
University of Ragusa (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Firenze (IT), Istituto Psicoanalitico per le Ricerche Sociali (IT), Istituto di Genomica Applicata (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
5.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.