Comparison of enhanced view-totally extraperitoneal technique and totally extraperitoneal technique in S1 scrotal hernia repair

The comparison of the eTEP technique to traditional TEP for scrotal hernia repair has not demonstrated any conclusive evidence of the superiority of eTEP. The outcomes associated with the eTEP technique were found to be comparable to those of TEP, with an average follow-up period of 19 months. Similar to TEP, the eTEP technique demonstrates both safety and feasibility in the management of scrotal hernias. Furthermore, it is necessary for prospective randomized studies to compare these two techniques directly, specifically in the realm of scrotal hernia repair.