Misread signals: a misinterpretation of population-level vaping and smoking trends

The increasing prevalence of e-cigarette use (vaping) among adolescents and young adults has ignited debate over its potential role in the initiation of cigarette smoking. Prospective cohort studies at the individual level consistently demonstrate a higher risk of smoking initiation among young people who have previously vaped when compared with those who have never vaped (sometimes called a 'gateway effect'). On the other hand, several studies analysing repeated cross-sectional data argue that vaping might decrease the risk of smoking through a 'displacement effect', as evidenced by an increasing vaping trend coinciding with a decreasing smoking trend. This perspective article examines these conflicting viewpoints in the context of a misinterpretation of these coinciding trends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Health Research & Practice
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/pu24007
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misread signals: a misinterpretation of population-level vaping and smoking trends

Qingwei Luo, Marianne Frances Weber, Michael David, Sam Egger et al.
3 citations
Public Health Research & Practice
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
3.49
article

Misread signals: a misinterpretation of population-level vaping and smoking trends

Qingwei Luo, Marianne Frances Weber, Michael David, Sam Egger, Becky Freeman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of e-cigarette use (vaping) among adolescents and young adults has ignited debate over its potential role in the initiation of cigarette smoking. Prospective cohort studies at the individual level consistently demonstrate a higher risk of smoking initiation among young people who have previously vaped when compared with those who have never vaped (sometimes called a 'gateway effect'). On the other hand, several studies analysing repeated cross-sectional data argue that vaping might decrease the risk of smoking through a 'displacement effect', as evidenced by an increasing vaping trend coinciding with a decreasing smoking trend. This perspective article examines these conflicting viewpoints in the context of a misinterpretation of these coinciding trends.

Public Health Research & PracticeVol. 35(1)
Griffith University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Human Growth Foundation (US), Cancer Council NSW (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Misread signals: a misinterpretation of population-level vaping and smoking trends — Qingwei Luo, Marianne Frances Weber, et al. · Public Health Research & Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS